Talk:Swami Kriyananda: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) (external links should not normally go in the body of an article) |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: The dead red was really bothering me, so I replace them with live external hyperlinks. Is that OK? They aren't exactly direct links to the named topics inWikipedia, but close enough. Thanks. [[User:Jack S. Byrom|Jack S. Byrom]] ([[User talk:Jack S. Byrom|talk]]) 10:03, 28 February 2023 (CST) | : The dead red was really bothering me, so I replace them with live external hyperlinks. Is that OK? They aren't exactly direct links to the named topics inWikipedia, but close enough. Thanks. [[User:Jack S. Byrom|Jack S. Byrom]] ([[User talk:Jack S. Byrom|talk]]) 10:03, 28 February 2023 (CST) | ||
::There is a convention of not including external hyperlinks in the body of the article itself. External links can be part of a reference, or on the External Links tab. If you'll restore the red links, I will put some stubs in place shortly (probably tomorrow). Sorry about that. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 10:11, 28 February 2023 (CST) | ::There is a convention of not including external hyperlinks in the body of the article itself. External links can be part of a reference, or on the External Links tab. If you'll restore the red links, I will put some stubs in place shortly (probably tomorrow). Sorry about that. Or leave them, I'll do it tomorrow (famous last words, he he). [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 10:11, 28 February 2023 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 10:12, 28 February 2023
red links added on purpose
I redlinked a couple of topics on this article as candidates for a pithy stub describing them in case the reader has no background in the subject area. It is okay if such a stub points off to another encyclopedia for "more details". Britannica is my favorite, but Wikipedia is okay too if the treatment over there isn't bad.Pat Palmer (talk) 09:17, 28 February 2023 (CST)
- The dead red was really bothering me, so I replace them with live external hyperlinks. Is that OK? They aren't exactly direct links to the named topics inWikipedia, but close enough. Thanks. Jack S. Byrom (talk) 10:03, 28 February 2023 (CST)
- There is a convention of not including external hyperlinks in the body of the article itself. External links can be part of a reference, or on the External Links tab. If you'll restore the red links, I will put some stubs in place shortly (probably tomorrow). Sorry about that. Or leave them, I'll do it tomorrow (famous last words, he he). Pat Palmer (talk) 10:11, 28 February 2023 (CST)