Subjective-objective dichotomy/External Links: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews mNo edit summary |
imported>John R. Brews (more details of sources) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
*{{cite web|url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114127/science-not-enemy-humanities |title=Pinker's essay on science and the humanities | *{{cite web|url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114127/science-not-enemy-humanities |author=Steven Pinker |title=Science is not your enemy: An impassioned plea to professors and tenure-less historians |publisher=New Republic |date=August 6, 2013}} Pinker's essay on science and the humanities: "Surely our conceptions of politics, culture, and morality have much to learn from our best understanding of the physical universe and of our makeup as a species." | ||
*{{cite web |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114548/leon-wieseltier-responds-steven-pinkers-scientism |title=Wieseltier's reply | *{{cite web |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114548/leon-wieseltier-responds-steven-pinkers-scientism |title=Crimes against humanity: Now science wants to invade the liberal arts. Don't let it happen. |author=Leon Wieseltier |publihser=New Republic |date=September 3, 2013}} Wieseltier's reply to Pinker. "The question of the place of science in knowledge, and in society, and in life, is not a scientific question...science [does not] confer any license to extend its categories and its methods beyond its own realms, whose contours are of course a matter of debate." | ||
*{{cite web |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114754/steven-pinker-leon-wieseltier-debate-science-vs-humanities |title= Pinker-Wieseltier debate Part III | *{{cite web |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114754/steven-pinker-leon-wieseltier-debate-science-vs-humanities |title=Science vs. the humanities: Round III |author=Steven Pinker, Leon Wieseltier |date=September 26, 2013 |publihser=New Republic}} Pinker-Wieseltier debate Part III. Pinker: "Good ideas can come from any source, and they must be evaluated on their cogency"; Wieseltier: "I am for a two-state solution. In this arena of tension, as in the other one, I believe that a one-state solution would involve the erasure of one of the realms, its distortion by, and subordination to, an authority that has no legitimate claim over it." | ||
Revision as of 17:37, 27 December 2013
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner and consider archiving the URLs behind the links you provide. See also related web sources.
- Steven Pinker (August 6, 2013). Science is not your enemy: An impassioned plea to professors and tenure-less historians. New Republic. Pinker's essay on science and the humanities: "Surely our conceptions of politics, culture, and morality have much to learn from our best understanding of the physical universe and of our makeup as a species."
- Leon Wieseltier (September 3, 2013). Crimes against humanity: Now science wants to invade the liberal arts. Don't let it happen.. Wieseltier's reply to Pinker. "The question of the place of science in knowledge, and in society, and in life, is not a scientific question...science [does not] confer any license to extend its categories and its methods beyond its own realms, whose contours are of course a matter of debate."
- Steven Pinker, Leon Wieseltier (September 26, 2013). Science vs. the humanities: Round III. Pinker-Wieseltier debate Part III. Pinker: "Good ideas can come from any source, and they must be evaluated on their cogency"; Wieseltier: "I am for a two-state solution. In this arena of tension, as in the other one, I believe that a one-state solution would involve the erasure of one of the realms, its distortion by, and subordination to, an authority that has no legitimate claim over it."