Talk:Archive:EC Election and Referenda December 2011: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones (These statements are stale) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Stale Statements: grrrrrrr) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Stale Statements== | ==Stale Statements== | ||
Must the statements link to old position statements from previous elections? I read these and they sound stale and dated. I want to know where the candidates stand currently. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 19:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC) | Must the statements link to old position statements from previous elections? I read these and they sound stale and dated. I want to know where the candidates stand currently. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 19:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
:None of us have FINISHED making out statements, for pete's sake! Moreover, not everyone at CZ has been around since its inception. Would you please cut us a little slack? In any case, if you, or anyone else, doesn't like the quality of our statements, you have a simple option: vote for someone else. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 20:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:36, 27 November 2011
Stale Statements
Must the statements link to old position statements from previous elections? I read these and they sound stale and dated. I want to know where the candidates stand currently. Russell D. Jones 19:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- None of us have FINISHED making out statements, for pete's sake! Moreover, not everyone at CZ has been around since its inception. Would you please cut us a little slack? In any case, if you, or anyone else, doesn't like the quality of our statements, you have a simple option: vote for someone else. Hayford Peirce 20:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC)