Talk:Belgian Shepherd Dog (Malinois): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Mary Ash No edit summary |
imported>D. Matt Innis |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Returned AKC description that was arbitrarily changed without explanation by another contributor.== | ==Returned AKC description that was arbitrarily changed without explanation by another contributor.== | ||
There was absolutely nothing wrong with the description or writing that was capriciously changed without written explanation. I have reverted back to the original article I was writing. As an "inuse" tag is not used here I can not tag the article as such. Also, there is plenty of articles waiting to be written, with few authors, so I would like to know why there is such an interest concerning an article I am attempting to write. [[User:Mary Ash|Mary Ash]] 19:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC) | There was absolutely nothing wrong with the description or writing that was capriciously changed without written explanation. I have reverted back to the original article I was writing. As an "inuse" tag is not used here I can not tag the article as such. Also, there is plenty of articles waiting to be written, with few authors, so I would like to know why there is such an interest concerning an article I am attempting to write. [[User:Mary Ash|Mary Ash]] 19:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Mary, that's nonsense. There's no reason to have to ask permission to copyedit another's work on a wiki. There is not, and hopefully never will be, an "inuse" tag at Citizendium precisely because we expect others to jump in and help each other. If you want to develop an article, use a sandbox, but know that it will get edited when you put it in public spade. Enjoy the fact that someone wants to work with you and please be kind. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 23:20, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:20, 9 August 2011
Returned AKC description that was arbitrarily changed without explanation by another contributor.
There was absolutely nothing wrong with the description or writing that was capriciously changed without written explanation. I have reverted back to the original article I was writing. As an "inuse" tag is not used here I can not tag the article as such. Also, there is plenty of articles waiting to be written, with few authors, so I would like to know why there is such an interest concerning an article I am attempting to write. Mary Ash 19:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- Mary, that's nonsense. There's no reason to have to ask permission to copyedit another's work on a wiki. There is not, and hopefully never will be, an "inuse" tag at Citizendium precisely because we expect others to jump in and help each other. If you want to develop an article, use a sandbox, but know that it will get edited when you put it in public spade. Enjoy the fact that someone wants to work with you and please be kind. D. Matt Innis 23:20, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Biology Category Check
- Hobbies Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Hobbies Developing Articles
- Hobbies Nonstub Articles
- Hobbies Internal Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Hobbies Underlinked Articles
- Hobbies tag