Entanglement (physics)/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Boris Tsirelson |
imported>Boris Tsirelson (→Historic: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Historic== | ==Historic== | ||
{{Citation | |||
| last1 = Einstein | |||
| first1 = Albert | |||
| last2 = Podolsky | |||
| first2 = Boris | |||
| last3 = Rosen | |||
| first3 = Nathan | |||
| year = 1935 | |||
| title = Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? | |||
| journal = Physical Review | |||
| volume = 47 | |||
| number = | |||
| pages = 777–780 | |||
| url = | |||
}}. | |||
{{Citation | {{Citation | ||
Revision as of 14:38, 25 September 2010
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
Historic
Einstein, Albert; Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen (1935), "Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?", Physical Review 47: 777–780.
Bell, J. S. (1964), "On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox", Physics 1 (3): 195–200 (available also here).
Non-technical
Mermin, N. David (1985), "Is the Moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory", Physics Today 38 (4): 38–47 (available also here and elsewhere).
Bell, John; A. Shimony & M. Horne et al. (1985), "An exchange on local beables", Dialectica 39 (2): 85–110.
Technical
Buhrman, Harry; Richard Cleve & Serge Massar et al. (2010), "Nonlocality and communication complexity", Reviews of Modern Physics 82 (1): 665–698 (also arXiv).