CZ Talk:Anarchism Subgroup: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
imported>Mirzhan Irkegulov
Line 15: Line 15:


:Would you elaborate on the co-opting? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 08:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
:Would you elaborate on the co-opting? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 08:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
::What i'm trying to explain is that anarchism deals with the abolition of the state. Not minimization, not reforming, not improving of it, but abolishing. It is what you call "pure", and anarchism can not be impure, or it is not anarchism. There are, however, many theories of minimizing state activity, from "libertarian" [[minarchism]] to left communism (Marxist branch, which has similarities with social anarchism, but again, is NOT anarchism). So i think that everything that is about abolishing the state by direct action is appropriate here (be it [[agorism]], [[left-libertarianism]] of Roderick Long and others, [[individualist anarchism]] of Tucker and Spooner, if we talk about "libertarian" anarchism), but everything that is about reforming the state should be elsewhere.
::I am a social anarchist myself, so you may thing i am biased, but this opinion is shared with those of my comrades, who are extreme market individualist anarchists. Our discussion is quite fruitful, so may be in future it is even better to create an article like "Differences between anarchism and libertarianism" with sources from anarchist theorists. --[[User:Mirzhan Irkegulov|Mirzhan Irkegulov]] 13:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:52, 21 September 2010

The Citizendium Anarchism Subgroup
Main article Home Talk All articles (5) Citable (0) Members (0) Recent changes


Forgotten where to endorse...

But I'll do so for politics.

Direct action

This needs to be disambiguated from direct action (military). Howard C. Berkowitz 19:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

"Libertarianism"

While the word "libertarian" is the synonym to the word "anarchist", nowadays another school of thought appropriated this term. May be someday one will create "libertarian subgroup"? It is obvious that "Libertarian parties", minarchists, conservatives have nothing to do with anarchism. And i don't mean market anarchism, but statist tendencies only. --Mirzhan Irkegulov 08:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Then this co-opting needs to be explained. As I mentioned, I have very little knowledge of the European schools of anarchism. Certainly since the mid-1960s, however, anarcho-libertarianism, in varying degrees, has been part of American libertarian theory and even practice.
The last term I would associate with libertarianism is statism. A "pure" anarcho-libertarian tends to want no government at all. Variants want extremely minimal government functions.
In the U.S., the Libertarian Party is not a strong force among extremely individualistic libertarians. Depending on who may be speaking, libertarianism may or may not be considered part of American conservatism. In the Tea Party Movement, there's a conflict between libertarian-oriented people that consider personal freedom to be the most important right, and social conservatives who want to control personal behavior. They have an uneasy alliance because both, in principle, want to reduce government.
Would you elaborate on the co-opting? Howard C. Berkowitz 08:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
What i'm trying to explain is that anarchism deals with the abolition of the state. Not minimization, not reforming, not improving of it, but abolishing. It is what you call "pure", and anarchism can not be impure, or it is not anarchism. There are, however, many theories of minimizing state activity, from "libertarian" minarchism to left communism (Marxist branch, which has similarities with social anarchism, but again, is NOT anarchism). So i think that everything that is about abolishing the state by direct action is appropriate here (be it agorism, left-libertarianism of Roderick Long and others, individualist anarchism of Tucker and Spooner, if we talk about "libertarian" anarchism), but everything that is about reforming the state should be elsewhere.
I am a social anarchist myself, so you may thing i am biased, but this opinion is shared with those of my comrades, who are extreme market individualist anarchists. Our discussion is quite fruitful, so may be in future it is even better to create an article like "Differences between anarchism and libertarianism" with sources from anarchist theorists. --Mirzhan Irkegulov 13:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)