Template:CharterVote2/41/Discussion: Difference between revisions
imported>Russell D. Jones (Suggestion) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Agree [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 00:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC) | Agree [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 00:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Agree. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:59, 18 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:59, 17 July 2010
All Citizens, including officials regardless of position or status, shall be bound by this Charter, and no referendum or decision of any council or official shall contravene it.
In cases where local, regional, national, or international law voids or limits clauses of this charter, all other clauses of this charter shall still be effectual and be interpreted consistent with law. For example but not as a limitation, Citizens under this Charter shall not be discriminated against on the basis of their age but many nations have laws regarding juvenile or under-age participation online. Such clauses in this charter shall be interpreted consistent with the law.
Agree Russell D. Jones 14:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- What about future amendments.. should we take them into consideration by stating something like the "Charter and future amendments"? D. Matt Innis 21:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Try this:
All Citizens, including officials regardless of position or status, shall be bound by this Charter, and no referendum or decision of any council or official shall contravene it.
In cases where local, regional, national, or international law voids or limits clauses of this charter or its amendments, all other clauses of this charter and/or its amendments shall still be effectual and be implemented consistent with law. For example but not as a limitation, Citizens under this Charter shall not be discriminated against on the basis of their age but many nations have laws regarding juvenile or under-age participation online. Such clauses in this charter shall be implemented consistent with the law.
Agree Russell D. Jones 00:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Agree. Howard C. Berkowitz 01:59, 18 July 2010 (UTC)