Template:CharterVote2/36/Discussion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis (gotcha) |
imported>Joe Quick No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Agree to keep Daniel's version above while deleting 37. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 01:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | :Agree to keep Daniel's version above while deleting 37. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 01:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Agree to Daniel's version and delete 37. [[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 04:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 19 July 2010
I agree with Martin's comment on art. 37, and suggest to delete 37, while rephrasing 36 in the following way:
Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either:
- New information is available; or
- A technical error was made during the previous formal procedure.
--Daniel Mietchen 22:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Or are you proposing to delete 37? I Agree with the text, in either case. Russell D. Jones 23:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter which of the two is deleted after the merger, but we have to pick one, and I suggest 37. --Daniel Mietchen 00:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Agree to keep Daniel's version above while deleting 37. D. Matt Innis 01:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Agree to Daniel's version and delete 37. Joe Quick 04:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)