Biology/Citable Version: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD
Line 40: Line 40:
===Early Biology : The European Renaissance and the Establishment of the Scientific Method===
===Early Biology : The European Renaissance and the Establishment of the Scientific Method===


When the authority of classic authors (such as Aristotle and Galen) and of religious doctrine (such as the teachings of the Catholic Church) on the nature of living things began to be openly questioned in light of actual observation and experiment, the [[scientific method]] became established. By the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century, the advantages of relying on empirical evidence instead of the opinions of respected authorities were advocated by such influential writers as [[Francis Bacon]] in England, and    . Rather than memorize the texts of [[Galen]], or perform ritual sorts of dissections as homage to Galen's findings, the anatomy and physiology of animals began to be explored. Unlike dissections that were carried out in other parts of the world, [[China]] for one, the early European biologists followed structures like nerves and veins that travelled between organs and analyzed their findings in an attempt to find general principles of the organization and function of the body. Theories in biology were still in a very preliminary phase in these times, but the publication of evidence for unifying ideas that explained an order to living things revolutionized thinking in biology.  
When the authority of classic authors (such as Aristotle and Galen) and of religious doctrine (such as the teachings of the Catholic Church) on the nature of living things began to be openly questioned in light of actual observation and experiment, the [[scientific method]] became established. By the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century, the advantages of relying on empirical evidence instead of the opinions of respected authorities were advocated by such influential writers as [[Francis Bacon]] in England, and    . Rather than memorize the texts of [[Galen]], or perform ritual sorts of dissections as homage to Galen's findings, the anatomy and physiology of animals began to be explored in new directions. Unlike dissections that were carried out in other parts of the world, [[China]] for one, the early European biologists followed structures like nerves and veins that travelled between organs and analyzed their findings in an attempt to find general principles of the organization and function of the body. Theories in biology were still in a very preliminary phase in these times, but the publication of evidence for unifying ideas that explained an order to living things revolutionized thinking in biology.  


The Englishman [[William Harvey]] studied how embryos develop, by  observations of hens' eggs. He speculated that development proceeded from one to another of the fetal forms he found, that these forms were stages of a continuous process. Although his experiments famously revealed the circulation of the blood, and identified the workings of the heart as pump -he could not really explain how discrete organs in the developing fetus form out of the amorphous materials in the pregnant womb or fertile egg. He chose a spiritual explanation, he postulated that the soul or new life was derived from the placement of sperm in the female tract. Still, he modified Aristotle's explanation by insisting that the male and female contributions were equally important. He refuted the notion that the fetus is made up by the specific materials contributed by the male, that grow because of the separate materials contributed by the female. Instead, he argued that "the material out of which the chick is formed in the egg is made at the same time it is formed" and that "out of the same material from which it is made, it is also nourished"<ref>(Van Speybroeck L, De Waele D, Van de Vijver G (2002) Theories in early embryology: close connections between epigenesis, preformationism, and self-organization. ''Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences'' 981:7-49 UI 12547672).</ref>
The Englishman [[William Harvey]] studied how embryos develop, by  observations of hens' eggs. He speculated that development proceeded from one to another of the fetal forms he found, that these forms were stages of a continuous process. Although his experiments famously revealed the circulation of the blood, and identified the workings of the heart as pump -he could not really explain how discrete organs in the developing fetus form out of the amorphous materials in the pregnant womb or fertile egg. He chose a spiritual explanation, he postulated that the soul or new life was derived from the placement of sperm in the female tract. Still, he modified Aristotle's explanation by insisting that the male and female contributions were equally important. He refuted the notion that the fetus is made up by the specific materials contributed by the male, that grow because of the separate materials contributed by the female. Instead, he argued that "the material out of which the chick is formed in the egg is made at the same time it is formed" and that "out of the same material from which it is made, it is also nourished"<ref>(Van Speybroeck L, De Waele D, Van de Vijver G (2002) Theories in early embryology: close connections between epigenesis, preformationism, and self-organization. ''Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences'' 981:7-49 UI 12547672).</ref>

Revision as of 15:51, 24 November 2006

The word "Biology" is formed by combining the Greek βίος (bios), meaning 'life', and λόγος (logos), meaning 'study of'. "Biology" in its modern use was probably introduced independently by both Gottfried Reinhold Treviranus (Biologie oder Philosophie der lebenden Natur, 1802) and by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (Hydrogéologie, 1802). Although the word "biology" is sometimes said to have been coined in 1800 by Karl Friedrich Burdach, it appears in the title of Volume 3 of Michael Christoph Hanov's Philosophiae naturalis sive physicae dogmaticae: Geologia, biologia, phytologia generalis et dendrologia, published in 1766.



collage image needed: fabulous shot of earth from space, juxtaposed to images of plants, animals, and people

Biology is the science of life. Biologists study all aspects of living things, including each of the many life forms on earth and the dynamic processes that enable life. Those vital processes include the harnessing of energy, the synthesis of the materials that make up the body, the healing of injuries, and the reproduction of the entire organism, among many other activities.

Living organisms have been of interest to all peoples throughout history, and, accordingly, the roots of biology go back to earliest mankind. Curiosity about the physical beings of people, plants, and animals still runs deep in every human society. How is it that these bodies change; develop, grow, and age? What is it that underlies the divide between inanimate objects and the living entities in the world? Some of those questions stem from our desire to control life processes, and to exploit natural resources. Pursuit of the answers has led to an understanding of organisms that has steadily improved our standard of living through the ages. But questions also come from a desire to understand nature rather than to control it, and the very core of that desire is sparked by a commonly felt need to understand the human condition and the nature of the world. Biology brings its own answers to these questions, and provides a useful way of learning about living things.

Not all natural lore is biology, no matter how accurate or helpful, and no matter that the subject is a plant or animal. Biologists incorporate an understanding of mathematics, physics, chemistry and other sciences, along with the scientific method, to their study of living things. Still, all human interaction with nature eventually adds to our understanding, whether the ideas came from evidence in the laboratory or the studbook of the horseman, from the notebook of the ecologist or the field notes of the hunter.

The Scope of Biology

How did life begin? What features separate something that is alive from something that is not alive?. The biologist uses science to try to answer these fundamental questions, questions that also concern the philosopher, the rabbi, the iman, and the priest - as well as every person who retains a sense of wonder. Whether scientific thinking about these issues is compatable with religious beliefs is itself contentious. Some great thinkers, such as the physicist Albert Einstein, have found no real conflict between the varying teachings of science and religion, but consider Divinity and the Natural Universe to be one and the same (see Albert Einstein for detailed discussion with references). In this view, mathematical equations and the language of prophets are simply two different forms of human expression, each attempting to describe a higher dimension than ordinary human experience.

Although science addresses fundamental issues about life, Biology is also used to answer the most practical of questions, which are posed to advance medical and dental care, agriculture and animal husbandry. It is through biology that the health sciences became such effective healing arts.

Many independent scientific fields make up Biology, but all are related. Natural History (the study of individual species like white-tailed deer, sugar maple trees, box jellyfish and timber wolves) was one of the first areas of biology to develop. In natural history, whole organisms are studied in an attempt to make sense of the order of Nature. When the natural histories of plants and animals are considered in a context of how each affects the other and their environment, then the biologist's focus is on ecology. Some fields of biology focus on the natural history of living organisms and their interactions within a certain realm of the earth, as in marine biology; others focus on particular aspects of the bodies of living organisms, like their structure (Anatomy) or function (Physiology). Studies of animals form the field of Zoology, whereas the study of plants is called Botany. Medicine and the Health Sciences apply biology to understanding disease and to improving health. Many of the academic disciplines that make up biology are listed at the bottom of this article along with a brief description. Further information about each is provided through links to other articles within Citizendium that can be accessed by clicking each discipline's name. Example.jpg

The development of biology

The remainder of this article explores selected themes in biology while providing a very abbreviated overview of the development of the science. For a more comprehensive review, please see:

For more information, see: History of biology.

Roots of Biology in Prehistory and the Ancient World

Whether foragers or farmers, hunters or herders, people have always depended on plants and animals for sustenance, and turned their thoughts to food. Paleolithic cave paintings show that careful observations of prey have been expressed for tens of millennia. Human interest in food is not limited to passive considerations. Rather than take sustenance simply as found, humans generally carry food items from place to place, and process them in various ways. Because of human intelligence, xxxxx this section needs development - explain about start with sugary cob, end up planting seeds. ( Ref -Sweet Beginnings: Stalk Sugar and the Domestication of Maize1/Comments/ReplyJohn Smalley, Michael Blake, Sergio J Chavez, Warren R Deboer, et al. Current Anthropology. Chicago: Dec 2003. Vol. 44, Iss. 5; p. 675). In neolithic times, agriculture became established in many human societies. When intellectual consideration of what plants are was combined with evidence-based experiments used to understand their growth, then botany, the science of plants, joined agriculture as a human endeavor (see Early Biology and the Establishment of the Scientific Method).

The beginnings of Anatomy and Zoology both date back at least as far as the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, to the Fourth Century BC. In the first known book on how life in the womb begins, Aristotle suggested that the woman provides the substance needed to build a new baby while the man provides the essence that gives this substance its humanity. Aristotle used logic and observation to arrive at his theory, which, in the main, was still accepted 2000 years later. Aristotle based his explanation of the creation of a new baby on a philosophic principle called epigenesis: the emergence of order from disorder. His conclusion that the woman's contribution was the mere soil for the man's seed, and that the man's contribution contained the essential humanity that simply required a nurturing womb to grow in, was likely influenced by the general agreement, in his society, that women were not as highly developed as men. It may also have come from the examination of the seeds of some trees, in which the entire immature plant is contained within the husk, and springs into independant life as a young tree once planted. A popular idea that grew out of Aristotle's musings was that sperm actually contained a perfect miniature version of the new baby - a homunculus.

The writings of the Greek scholars were largely preserved and read by the Romans, who added additional literature on xxxx of the structure and function of animal and human bodies. Galen-dissection and vivisection.

Stasis of Progress in Medieval Europe, Arab World becomes Primary Repository of Western Medicine

With the Fall of Rome in the West, the Greek and Roman works became marginalized. Few texts were preserved, and few people could read them - both the literature and the readers often cloistered together in religious orders.

Padua

Early Biology : The European Renaissance and the Establishment of the Scientific Method

When the authority of classic authors (such as Aristotle and Galen) and of religious doctrine (such as the teachings of the Catholic Church) on the nature of living things began to be openly questioned in light of actual observation and experiment, the scientific method became established. By the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century, the advantages of relying on empirical evidence instead of the opinions of respected authorities were advocated by such influential writers as Francis Bacon in England, and . Rather than memorize the texts of Galen, or perform ritual sorts of dissections as homage to Galen's findings, the anatomy and physiology of animals began to be explored in new directions. Unlike dissections that were carried out in other parts of the world, China for one, the early European biologists followed structures like nerves and veins that travelled between organs and analyzed their findings in an attempt to find general principles of the organization and function of the body. Theories in biology were still in a very preliminary phase in these times, but the publication of evidence for unifying ideas that explained an order to living things revolutionized thinking in biology.

The Englishman William Harvey studied how embryos develop, by observations of hens' eggs. He speculated that development proceeded from one to another of the fetal forms he found, that these forms were stages of a continuous process. Although his experiments famously revealed the circulation of the blood, and identified the workings of the heart as pump -he could not really explain how discrete organs in the developing fetus form out of the amorphous materials in the pregnant womb or fertile egg. He chose a spiritual explanation, he postulated that the soul or new life was derived from the placement of sperm in the female tract. Still, he modified Aristotle's explanation by insisting that the male and female contributions were equally important. He refuted the notion that the fetus is made up by the specific materials contributed by the male, that grow because of the separate materials contributed by the female. Instead, he argued that "the material out of which the chick is formed in the egg is made at the same time it is formed" and that "out of the same material from which it is made, it is also nourished"[1]

The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries xxxx

As detailed examination of plant and animal species became common, and the knowledge derived from it was shared among geographically distant contemporaries through the print media, similar patterns of structures were found in many different sorts of species. In the Eighteenth Century,the Swedish naturalist Carolus Linnaeus proposed a way of systematically classifying all living things. His method gives a unique name to each kind of plant and animal, and organizes all of them into a classification scheme that stresses similarities of physical features - based on their comparative anatomy. This naming system is still used today, and each known species has one unique scientific name that biologists all over the world recognize. The name has two parts: genus and species, the two most refined categories in the classification scheme. The language of these names is latin, which was the common written language of scholars in Europe in Linnaeus' time.

Although this systematic classification of all living things became widely accepted, at first it did not include the idea that all living things were somehow related. For more than a hundred years afterward, even highly educated thinkers assumed that even complicated life forms (such as mice) could spring to life from a setting of inaminate objects (such as old rags and bread crumbs left in a dark corner). In the Nineteenth Century, experiments of Louis Pasteur of France showed that this commonly held notion, spontaneous generation, was a fallacy. His life's work in bacteriology, along with the later work of the German physician Robert Koch, was important in establishing the germ theory of disease.

Charles Darwin built on the idea of natural selection as a way to explain how different life forms might have common patterns of form. His observations of the variations of animal life on remote islands led him to postulate that individual creatures might thrive, or die, according to how well their characteristics fitted their immediate habitat. In this way, certain inherited features might become more or less pronounced in a species over generations, and entirely new species might eventually arise. His theories became incorporated into the theory of evolution which suggests that all present living things descended from past living things. The existance of common ancestors would account for similar body forms among descendents, and provided a plausible basis for the wide-spread existance of patterns of very similar features among groups of living things: the very patterns that Linnaeus had used to formulate his categories in classification. This idea was not entirely new, but previous proponents were stymied by the question of how such incredibly diverse life forms might come about in the few thousand years that the world was thought to have existed. By Darwin's time, advances in Earth Science had established evidence that the earth was much older than had been previously suspected, on the order of millions of years. Acceptance of this magnitude of time scale among scientists made the notion of incremental change over generations a more reasonable possibilty. Evolutionary change fron ancient life was accepted by biologists as a theory that explained both the diversity of life forms and the existance of patterns of common features.

Technology advances Biology

First Glimpses of the Microscopic World

The features of plants and animals have often been understood on an entirely different levels with technological advances that provided new means for examining them. For example, the microscope, modified by Antoni van Leeuwenhoek in the Seventeenth Century, revealed details of structure in the bodies of organisms that had never before been even suspected. One of the new sights he described were individual ovum and spermatozoa, and being familiar with the theories of Aristotle, he reported that he could actually see homunculi in the heads of the living sperm - an example of even a great scientist sometimes seeing what he expected to see, rather than what was really there. Science is always influenced by past ideas. No scientist can consider any idea, or analyze experiemental results without using his or her mind. That mind is both consciously and unconsciously stamped with the culture that produced it.

File:Drawing of sperm by van Leeuwenhoek showing homunculus.jpg

Not only was the structure of flesh and plants seen at a new level of detail with the microscope, but completely new types of organisms were also revealed: micro-organisms that could not be detected with the naked eye. [2] And so, like all important technological advances in biology, the microsocope led to new ideas about living things. The concept that tissues were composed of cells was initiated, the field of microbiology was born, and the ground was prepared for the germ theory of disease, an idea that helped bring the traditional practice of western medicine (sometimes called allopathy) into the field of health science and modern medicine.

Further developments led to the modern compound microscope by the end of the 19th century, with much higher resolution, and eventually the late 20th century electron microscopes were built using electronic technology. Science differs from religious and political doctrine in at least one major manner – tenants are not to be held sacred but questioned and tested. This has proved damaging for many of them, including the homunculus theory of fetal development. With improved optics and the new imaging techniques of scanning and transmission electron microscopes, that "little man" inside the sperm cell vanished forever.

Just add caption here!

Ultra-high power magnification imaging creates new knowledge:Cell Biology begins

With ultra-high power examination of cells, another new discipline within biology began to flourish, and the idea that living organisms were all composed of cells clarified. Scientists in the field of cell biology began to unravel the inner architecture of cells, discovering discrete organelles that could only be seen well with tremendous magnification power. Closer visual examination of the structure of the cell was combined with the ability to physically separate out the components of the cells in bulk by weight and chemical properties and analyze each fraction using methods from biochemistry and biophysics. The important techniques that allowed this kind of analysis include ultracentrifugation and gel electrophoresis.

Understanding the ultrastructure of cells along with correlated chemical and physical properties of the organelles brought more new ideas to biology. An example of both a new organelle and, new idea -mitochondria. Cell biologists applied their findings to the systematic classification of plants and animals, and relationships were further refined.

Molecular Biology.

Double Helix

RNA

With DNA chemistry, biologists took off their parkas and came out of the refrigerated cold rooms that were the only workplaces in which RNA remained stable long enough to perform experiments with it that had elucidated the general functions of the endoplasmic reticulum and xxxx. The technique of PCR allowed automated experiments on tiny samples of DNA in a standard laboratory setting, and progress in molecular biology accelerated tremendously.

Using molecular biology techniques to study the organelles discovered through electron microscopy did not just add more details but led to startling new concepts. The mitochondria seen in active human cells were not human at all, at least not in origin. These organelles had been assimilated into eukaryotic cells and divided along with them, but according to their own genetic code, a circular strand of DNA that resembles the genome of bacteria. These energy producing organelles of animal cells were not the only organelles found that derived from a different life form. The chloroplast of plant cells are another.

The age-old discussion of just how a new baby came to be born of man and woman took unexpected turns as well. Apparently, the single cell that every human begins with does not receive identical types of genetic contributions from mother and father, at all. One of the biggest differences between what each parent gives their baby has to do with what’s in the egg, but not in the sperm, and that would be cell organelles, specifically these mitochondria. Each individual human being is made up of cells with mother's mitochondria only, including the mitochondrial DNA.

Imprinting of genes by parental origin another inequality in genetics that had been unsuspected. Back to corn,

Main topics and discoveries

For more information, see: List of biology topics, History of plant systematics, History of zoology, post-Darwin, and History of zoology (before Darwin).
For more information, see: History of molecular biology and Timeline of biology and organic chemistry.

Major discoveries in biology include:

Disciplines within biology

For more information, see: List of biology disciplines.


Template:Biology-footer

References

Citations
  1. (Van Speybroeck L, De Waele D, Van de Vijver G (2002) Theories in early embryology: close connections between epigenesis, preformationism, and self-organization. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 981:7-49 UI 12547672).
  2. Anton van Leeuwenhoek. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2nd ed. 17 Vols. Gale Research, 1998. Reproduced in Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Thomson Gale. 2006
Further reading

The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation and Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Timothy Shanahan. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004. 342 pp. (ISBN 0521834139 cloth)

Selected external links

The following links have been reviewed and are recommended because, at the time of their inclusion, they provided accurate information and portals to additional excellent web resources. Many other excellent links have been omitted through no fault of their own.

Plain and technical language