User:Boris Tsirelson/Sandbox1: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Boris Tsirelson
No edit summary
imported>Boris Tsirelson
Line 1: Line 1:
=Schröder–Bernstein property=
=Schröder–Bernstein property=


The general idea of the Cantor–Bernstein–Schroeder theorem and related results may be formulated as follows. If ''X'' is similar to a part of ''Y'' and at the same time ''Y'' is similar to a part of ''X'' then ''X'' and ''Y'' are similar. In order to be specific one should decide
A mathematical property is said to be a Schröder–Bernstein (or Cantor–Schröder–Bernstein, or Cantor–Bernstein) property if it is formulated in the following form.
:If ''X'' is similar to a part of ''Y'' and at the same time ''Y'' is similar to a part of ''X'' then ''X'' and ''Y'' are similar.
In order to be specific one should decide
* what kind of mathematical objects are ''X'' and ''Y'',
* what kind of mathematical objects are ''X'' and ''Y'',
* what is meant by "a part",
* what is meant by "a part",

Revision as of 05:31, 2 September 2010

Schröder–Bernstein property

A mathematical property is said to be a Schröder–Bernstein (or Cantor–Schröder–Bernstein, or Cantor–Bernstein) property if it is formulated in the following form.

If X is similar to a part of Y and at the same time Y is similar to a part of X then X and Y are similar.

In order to be specific one should decide

  • what kind of mathematical objects are X and Y,
  • what is meant by "a part",
  • what is meant by "similar".

In the classical Cantor–Bernstein–Schroeder theorem

  • X and Y are sets (maybe infinite),
  • "a part" is interpreted as a subset,
  • "similar" is interpreted as equinumerous.

Not all statements of this form are true. For example, let

  • X and Y are triangles,
  • "a part" means a triangle inside the given triangle,
  • "similar" is interpreted as usual in elementary geometry: triangles related by a dilation (in other words, "triangles with the same shape up to a scale factor", or equivalently "triangles with the same angles").

Then the statement fails badly: every triangle X evidently is similar to some triangle inside Y, and the other way round; however, X and Y need no be similar.

Notes

References

Srivastava, S.M. (1998), A Course on Borel Sets, Springer. See Proposition 3.3.6 (on page 96), and the first paragraph of Section 3.3 (on page 94).

Gowers, W.T. (1996), "A solution to the Schroeder-Bernstein problem for Banach spaces", Bull. London Math. Soc. 28: 297–304.

Casazza, P.G. (1989), "The Schroeder-Bernstein property for Banach spaces", Contemp. Math. 85: 61–78.

External links

Theme and variations: Schroeder-Bernstein

When does Cantor Bernstein hold?