Emergency medical service: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Caesar Schinas
m (Robot: Changing template: TOC-right)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
{{TOC-right}}
{{TOC|right}}
'''Emergency medical service (EMS)''', in the Middle Ages, was little more than a wagoneer calling "bring out your dead". Of course, little could be offered then to a victim of [[trauma medicine|trauma]] or acute illness. Today, one of the challenges of EMS is how much care to render on site or in an ambulance equipped for advanced cardiac and trauma life support, and when "scoop and run" is far more important.   
'''Emergency medical service (EMS)''', in the Middle Ages, was little more than a wagoneer calling "bring out your dead". Of course, little could be offered then to a victim of [[trauma medicine|trauma]] or acute illness. Today, one of the challenges of EMS is how much care to render on site or in an ambulance equipped for advanced cardiac and trauma life support, and when "scoop and run" is far more important.   
==Battlefield insights==
==Battlefield insights==

Revision as of 04:34, 31 May 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Emergency medical service (EMS), in the Middle Ages, was little more than a wagoneer calling "bring out your dead". Of course, little could be offered then to a victim of trauma or acute illness. Today, one of the challenges of EMS is how much care to render on site or in an ambulance equipped for advanced cardiac and trauma life support, and when "scoop and run" is far more important.

Battlefield insights

One of the few good things to come from war tends to be advances in medicine, especially trauma medicine. Still, it was well into the twentieth century before there were services to which rapid evacuation would produce dramatic results. Clearly, however, mortality and morbidity decreased dramatically during the Korean War, where evacuation helicopters met forward-deployed surgical hospitals. Greater helicopter availability, coupled with a much better understanding of trauma, led to even better performance during the Vietnam War. Literally, a soldier, severely wounded in battle in the late sixties, had a better chance of survival than a comparably injured victim of an automobile accident in his civilian home.[1] The died-of-wounds figure was slightly greater in Vietnam than Korea, because better field stabilization and rapid evacuation brought mortally injured victims to the hospital where they died.

War Death as a percentage of hits Ratio of killed to wounded
Second World War 29% 1: 3.1
Korean War 26% 1: 4.1
Vietnam War 19% 1: 5.6

Civilian recognition of shock and trauma

In the U.S. civilian context, the key event in developing modern EMS systems came in 1966, when the Committees on Trauma and Shock, of the National Academies of Science, published what is widely called "the white paper", Accidental Death and Disability: the Neglected Disease of Modern Society."[2]

Golden Hour

Levels of EMT

Basic and advanced cardiac life support

References

  1. Neel, Spurgeon (1973), Medical Support of the U.S. Army in Vietnam 1965-1970, Center for Military History, U.S. Department of the Army Chapter 3, "Care of the Wounded", p. 51
  2. Committee On Trauma And Committee On Shock, National Academies of Science (1966), Accidental Death And Disability: The Neglected Disease Of Modern Society