Talk:House of Commons (United Kingdom): Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner (→Overhaul: new section) |
imported>Nick Gardner |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Overhaul == | == Overhaul == | ||
This article would benefit, in my opinion, from | This article would benefit, in my opinion, from an overhaul to improve its clarity, remove irrelevant matter and repair its omissions and lack of citations. The present arrangement of the material is such that for much of it a piecemeal edit would not serve the purpose. Any volunteers? | ||
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 15:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:07, 18 February 2012
Move
I think this is going to have to be renamed because Canada also has a House of Commons. We could call this House of Commons of the United Kingdom (not 'British House of Commons' - the website has UK in it). I see no reason, for the moment, why House of Commons can't redirect here, though. John Stephenson 03:17, 13 June 2008 (CDT)
- Slept on this and though that House of Commons (UK) would be better, as House of Commons of the United Kingdom also looks like a formal name. John Stephenson 21:58, 13 June 2008 (CDT)
Article moved =
I acted boldy and moved it to House of Commons (United Kingdom). I will work up the disambig shortly. David E. Volk 18:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Overhaul
This article would benefit, in my opinion, from an overhaul to improve its clarity, remove irrelevant matter and repair its omissions and lack of citations. The present arrangement of the material is such that for much of it a piecemeal edit would not serve the purpose. Any volunteers? Nick Gardner 15:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)