Baehr v. Lewin/Definition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
imported>Bruce M. Tindall m (year) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Subpages}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{Subpages}}</noinclude> | ||
In | In 1993, a state supreme court ruling in Hawaii in a case involving same sex marriage, held that under Hawaii's Equal Rights amendment a standard of "strict scrutiny" must be applied to any case that deprives people of basic civil rights. The decision did not establish a fundamental right of same sex marriage and was later invalidated by an amendment to the state constitution. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:27, 12 November 2008
This article contains just a definition and optionally other subpages (such as a list of related articles), but no metadata. Create the metadata page if you want to expand this into a full article.
Baehr v. Lewin [r]: In 1993, a state supreme court ruling in Hawaii in a case involving same sex marriage, held that under Hawaii's Equal Rights amendment a standard of "strict scrutiny" must be applied to any case that deprives people of basic civil rights. The decision did not establish a fundamental right of same sex marriage and was later invalidated by an amendment to the state constitution.