Talk:Air pollution dispersion modeling/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Wanted to clarify one point: new section) |
imported>Milton Beychok m (→Wanted to clarify one point: Response to Howard) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Am I correct in my intuition that a "bent-over" plume is one that moves off the vertical axis of the stack, because its vertical energy is no longer sufficient to overcome horizontal crosswind components? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 00:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC) | Am I correct in my intuition that a "bent-over" plume is one that moves off the vertical axis of the stack, because its vertical energy is no longer sufficient to overcome horizontal crosswind components? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 00:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Yep, your intuition is correct. I did not define it because I thought that the diagram I provided was adequate to define the plume shape. Do you think a textual description is also needed? Would it be better if I simply expanded ... '''''he proposed for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes''''' to ... '''''he proposed for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes (as depicted in the plume diagram)''''' ? [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 01:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:02, 28 December 2008
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. | |
I released this article to Wikipedia. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Wikipedia content on the Citizendium applies. | |
Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice. |
I was the original sole author of this Wikipedia article
I copied it to here at Citizendium as is with the exception that the Wikipedia article title was "Atmospheric dispersion modeling"... and will now delete all of the Wikipedia links and certain sections. I will also be making some wording changes. - Milton Beychok 23:08, 25 January 2008 (CST)
Wanted to clarify one point
Maybe you defined it and I'm not seeing it, or it's one of those case where "it's intuitively obvious", and it actually is because I have an intuition. Confusing enough?
Am I correct in my intuition that a "bent-over" plume is one that moves off the vertical axis of the stack, because its vertical energy is no longer sufficient to overcome horizontal crosswind components? Howard C. Berkowitz 00:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, your intuition is correct. I did not define it because I thought that the diagram I provided was adequate to define the plume shape. Do you think a textual description is also needed? Would it be better if I simply expanded ... he proposed for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes to ... he proposed for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes (as depicted in the plume diagram) ? Milton Beychok 01:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Nonstub Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Internal Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Advanced Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Earth Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Earth Sciences Advanced Articles
- Earth Sciences Internal Articles
- Chemical Engineering tag
- Environmental Engineering tag