Pseudoscience/External Links: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* [http://rudolfhsmit.nl/index.html Astrology & Science The Scientific Exploration of Astrology] "An archive of 69 articles with abstracts and references. Results of hundreds of tests. Historical and philosophical views." | * [http://rudolfhsmit.nl/index.html Astrology & Science The Scientific Exploration of Astrology] "An archive of 69 articles with abstracts and references. Results of hundreds of tests. Historical and philosophical views." | ||
* [http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/lakatos/scienceAndPseudoscience.htm ''Science and Pseudoscience''] - transcript and broadcast of talk by Imre Lakatos | * [http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/lakatos/scienceAndPseudoscience.htm ''Science and Pseudoscience''] - transcript and broadcast of talk by Imre Lakatos | ||
*[http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/geology/techist.html Plate Tectonics:] The Rocky History of an Idea; | *[http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/geology/techist.html Plate Tectonics:] The Rocky History of an Idea; on rthe webite of the Museum of Palaeontology, University of California | ||
* [http://www.umtec.ch/dokumente/dokumente/downloads/publikationen/Checklist%20for%20identifying%20dubious%20technical%20processes%20and%20products.pdf Checklist for identifying dubious technologies]; Bunge, R, Stoll, J-M, and Bucher, B. | * [http://www.umtec.ch/dokumente/dokumente/downloads/publikationen/Checklist%20for%20identifying%20dubious%20technical%20processes%20and%20products.pdf Checklist for identifying dubious technologies]; Bunge, R, Stoll, J-M, and Bucher, B. | ||
Revision as of 11:47, 29 November 2007
There are many websites set up to air skeptical opinions particularly concerning claims for the effectiveness of remedies or treatments for a wide range of medical conditions which are not endorsed by conventional medicine, and to criticise unconventional "fringe" theories that are not generally accepted. The standard of these sites (and the standards of arguments within them) vary considerably, and it would be a mistake to assume that these always present the fringe theories fairly, or the scientific arguments (for or against) rigorously. Among these sites are:
- "Quackwatch", operated by Stephen Barratt M.D> who also runs a wide range of similar more specialised sites. This site has prompted a counter site "Quackpotwatch"
- The Skeptics Society and Skeptic magazine(US)
- The Skeptic magazine (UK)
- Committee for Skeptical Inquiry
- Skeptical Inquirer magazine
- UFO skeptic site "by and for professional scientists"
- The Skeptics Guide to the Universe; a weekly Podcast talkshow produced by the New England Skeptical Society in association with the James Randi Educational Foundation: discussing news and topics from the world of the paranormal, fringe science, and controversial claims from a scientific point of view.
- New England Sceptical Society
- James Randi Educational Foundation- "an educational resource on the paranormal, pseudoscientific, and the supernatural."
- Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List "A selected list of resources for those who want to examine with a skeptical eye some of the claims at the fringes of science that seem connected to astronomy."
- Astrology & Science The Scientific Exploration of Astrology "An archive of 69 articles with abstracts and references. Results of hundreds of tests. Historical and philosophical views."
- Science and Pseudoscience - transcript and broadcast of talk by Imre Lakatos
- Plate Tectonics: The Rocky History of an Idea; on rthe webite of the Museum of Palaeontology, University of California
- Checklist for identifying dubious technologies; Bunge, R, Stoll, J-M, and Bucher, B.