Argument (philosophy): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger (Well, it's a start!) |
imported>Joseph Bessie No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An '''argument''', in [[logic]] and [[philosophy]], may be defined as a set of statements, one member of which | An '''argument''', in [[logic]] and [[philosophy]], may be defined in its most ordinary sense as a set of statements, one member of which is the ''conclusion,'' the other members being ''premises'' (or ''premisses''). The premises are reasons intended to show that the conclusion is, or is probably, true. | ||
When an argument is presented to | When an argument is presented to show that its conclusion is true (not just probably true), the argument is called ''deductive''. When an argument is presented to show that its conclusion is ''probably'' true, the argument is called ''inductive''. | ||
[[Category:CZ Live]] | [[Category:CZ Live]] | ||
[[Category:Stub Articles]] | [[Category:Stub Articles]] | ||
[[Category:Philosophy Workgroup]] | [[Category:Philosophy Workgroup]] | ||
Revision as of 20:55, 8 November 2007
An argument, in logic and philosophy, may be defined in its most ordinary sense as a set of statements, one member of which is the conclusion, the other members being premises (or premisses). The premises are reasons intended to show that the conclusion is, or is probably, true.
When an argument is presented to show that its conclusion is true (not just probably true), the argument is called deductive. When an argument is presented to show that its conclusion is probably true, the argument is called inductive.