Talk:Metaphor: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
imported>Brian P. Long
(→‎Jakobson: new section)
Line 4: Line 4:


I find the Intro to [[Metaphor]] a bit too abbreviated.  I'd like it if it explained more, perhaps exemplified, and if it introduced the broader context of metaphor.  Perhaps it needs to wait for the article to develop first.  Personal opinions. --[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 03:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I find the Intro to [[Metaphor]] a bit too abbreviated.  I'd like it if it explained more, perhaps exemplified, and if it introduced the broader context of metaphor.  Perhaps it needs to wait for the article to develop first.  Personal opinions. --[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 03:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
== Jakobson ==
It seems to me that any discussion of metaphor really should include a discussion of the rather specialized way in which Roman Jakobson talks about metaphor (in opposition to metonymy). Not that I'm really qualified to do so, of course...
I just looked at the WP metaphor article, and they don't have any discussion of Jakobson either. If we did it, it would be one way our article could be made more useful than WP's.
[[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 04:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:12, 15 August 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Addendum [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Expression directing the mind to understand and experience one kind of thing in terms of another. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Linguistics, Biology and Literature [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Intoduction

I find the Intro to Metaphor a bit too abbreviated. I'd like it if it explained more, perhaps exemplified, and if it introduced the broader context of metaphor. Perhaps it needs to wait for the article to develop first. Personal opinions. --Anthony.Sebastian 03:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Jakobson

It seems to me that any discussion of metaphor really should include a discussion of the rather specialized way in which Roman Jakobson talks about metaphor (in opposition to metonymy). Not that I'm really qualified to do so, of course...

I just looked at the WP metaphor article, and they don't have any discussion of Jakobson either. If we did it, it would be one way our article could be made more useful than WP's.

Brian P. Long 04:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Metaphor&oldid=326491"