Talk:Petrarch: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Theodore Beale
No edit summary
imported>Theodore Beale
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Petrarch
|                cat1 = Literature
|                cat2 = Classics
|                cat3 = History
|          cat_check = y
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup =
|                  by =
}}
Yes, Petrarch would be best.  His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca.  Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --{{unsigned|Theodore Beale}}
Yes, Petrarch would be best.  His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca.  Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --{{unsigned|Theodore Beale}}



Revision as of 02:55, 3 November 2007


Article Checklist for "Petrarch"
Workgroup category or categories Literature Workgroup, Classics Workgroup, History Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Nobody

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






Yes, Petrarch would be best. His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca. Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --...said Theodore Beale (talk) (Please sign your talk page posts by simply adding four tildes, ~~~~.)


(edit conflict!)

Don't hesitate to move the article back to Francesco Petrarch; maybe that's right, I don't claim to know much about him. It's just that we prefer the names by which someone is most commonly known, and there are some historical figures, like Michelangelo (often from the Renaissance, no?), who have these sorts of single names. --Larry Sanger 19:32, 1 November 2007 (CDT)


No conflict, I was offering support for your action. In fact, I would have moved the article myself, but I didn't know how.Theodore Beale 05:07, 2 November 2007 (CDT)