Talk:Petrarch: Difference between revisions
imported>Theodore Beale No edit summary |
imported>Theodore Beale No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Petrarch | |||
| cat1 = Literature | |||
| cat2 = Classics | |||
| cat3 = History | |||
| cat_check = y | |||
| status = 2 | |||
| underlinked = y | |||
| cleanup = | |||
| by = | |||
}} | |||
Yes, Petrarch would be best. His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca. Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --{{unsigned|Theodore Beale}} | Yes, Petrarch would be best. His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca. Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --{{unsigned|Theodore Beale}} | ||
Revision as of 02:55, 3 November 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Literature Workgroup, Classics Workgroup, History Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Nobody |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Yes, Petrarch would be best. His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca. Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --...said Theodore Beale (talk) (Please sign your talk page posts by simply adding four tildes, ~~~~.)
(edit conflict!)
Don't hesitate to move the article back to Francesco Petrarch; maybe that's right, I don't claim to know much about him. It's just that we prefer the names by which someone is most commonly known, and there are some historical figures, like Michelangelo (often from the Renaissance, no?), who have these sorts of single names. --Larry Sanger 19:32, 1 November 2007 (CDT)
No conflict, I was offering support for your action. In fact, I would have moved the article myself, but I didn't know how.Theodore Beale 05:07, 2 November 2007 (CDT)
- Literature Category Check
- General Category Check
- Classics Category Check
- History Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Literature Advanced Articles
- Literature Nonstub Articles
- Literature Internal Articles
- Classics Advanced Articles
- Classics Nonstub Articles
- Classics Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Literature Developed Articles
- Classics Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Literature Developing Articles
- Classics Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Literature Stub Articles
- Classics Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Literature External Articles
- Classics External Articles
- History External Articles
- Literature Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Classics Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Literature Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Classics Cleanup
- History Cleanup