Talk:Lemur: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen
mNo edit summary
imported>Lee R. Berger
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Catalog of lemurs==
==Catalog of lemurs==
I'd just like to suggest that the list of lemurs in this article instead go into [[Catalog of lemurs]].  I'd also suggest that the catalog and an image gallery be one and the same.   —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 20:27, 11 August 2007 (CDT)
I'd just like to suggest that the list of lemurs in this article instead go into [[Catalog of lemurs]].  I'd also suggest that the catalog and an image gallery be one and the same.   —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 20:27, 11 August 2007 (CDT)
*That's fine with me - what I was trying to do with this was just to begin building stubs that have some substance so some fine young grad students who are experts on lemurs might just start filling in the blanks.  By the way, my strategy - if one could call it that - is to try and make a number of  large articles - like the work in progress [[Primate]] - create lots of potential links and then begin building stubs such as this.  Do you think that's the right way to go about it?
[[User:Lee R. Berger|Lee R. Berger]] 03:20, 12 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 02:20, 12 August 2007

Catalog of lemurs

I'd just like to suggest that the list of lemurs in this article instead go into Catalog of lemurs. I'd also suggest that the catalog and an image gallery be one and the same.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 20:27, 11 August 2007 (CDT)

  • That's fine with me - what I was trying to do with this was just to begin building stubs that have some substance so some fine young grad students who are experts on lemurs might just start filling in the blanks. By the way, my strategy - if one could call it that - is to try and make a number of large articles - like the work in progress Primate - create lots of potential links and then begin building stubs such as this. Do you think that's the right way to go about it?

Lee R. Berger 03:20, 12 August 2007 (CDT)