Talk:Nathanael Greene/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(approval process started)
imported>D. Matt Innis
(fix editor name)
Line 2: Line 2:
|url = http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Nathanael_Greene
|url = http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Nathanael_Greene
|now =19:40, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
|now =19:40, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
|editor=[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 19:40, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
|editor=Richard Jensen
|editor2=
|editor2=
|editor3=
|editor3=

Revision as of 19:10, 31 August 2007


Toapprove.png
Richard Jensen has nominated the version dated 19:40, 31 August 2007 (CDT) of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The History Workgroup and Military Workgroup are overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on 20070905.



Article Checklist for "Nathanael Greene/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories History Workgroup, Military Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Todd Coles 08:20, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Legacy

I am aware that many things have been named for Nathanael Greene (Greensboro, South Carolina, several schools, etc.), and WP even has a long unsourced list. I am unsure where, or if, these should be included in the article. Does anyone have any opinions on this? --Todd Coles 08:20, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

Approval

I think you should get an editor to look this over. Perhaps add a few books in the Bibliography too Denis Cavanagh 08:07, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

The problem with more books is that there just aren't a lot of books written on him specifically. There are plenty of American Revolution surveys and general military histories out there, but I figured I would concentrate the books here as specifically on his life as I could. (I'm tired, I don't know if that's making sense..)
Yes, I think it is very close, if not ready for approval. I've notified Richard Jensen about it, and I know he is aware of it, so I'm just going to leave it in his hands unless another editor comes along.
Thanks for the comment! --Todd Coles 08:28, 30 August 2007 (CDT)