Talk:HTTP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Overall organization, and Web cache protocols) |
imported>Pat Palmer |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Is Cisco's WCCP the de facto standard, or is an IETF protocol such as ICP commonly used? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 11:57, 17 July 2008 (CDT) | Is Cisco's WCCP the de facto standard, or is an IETF protocol such as ICP commonly used? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 11:57, 17 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
==note to self== | |||
Much of the article needs to be moved to [[World Wide Web]], as it pertains to payloads of HTTP, rather than the protocol itself. | |||
Revision as of 08:33, 12 June 2011
Move?
I propose moving this article to Hypertext Transfer Protocol, leaving a redirect from HTTP. (We should probably also add a redirect from http and maybe HyperText Transfer Protocol, too.) The naming conventions page doesn't explicitly address abbreviations, but it seems that using acronyms and abbreviations for article titles in general will lead to a great deal of confusion, even if HTTP is itself unambiguous. Anthony Argyriou 16:51, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
- Agreed, although I didn't do the moves before I did updates today. I also created an actual article about hypertext, rather than a redirect to HTML.Howard C. Berkowitz 11:57, 17 July 2008 (CDT)
Is there a real web cache protocol expert in the house?
Is Cisco's WCCP the de facto standard, or is an IETF protocol such as ICP commonly used? Howard C. Berkowitz 11:57, 17 July 2008 (CDT)
note to self
Much of the article needs to be moved to World Wide Web, as it pertains to payloads of HTTP, rather than the protocol itself.