Talk:U.S. Economic history: Difference between revisions
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>Nick Gardner (→Economic history or economic gossip?: new section) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is entitrely by Richard Jensen (some it appeared in Wikipedia). [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 01:47, 8 July 2007 (CDT) | This is entitrely by Richard Jensen (some it appeared in Wikipedia). [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 01:47, 8 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Economic history or economic gossip? == | |||
This article contains a number of unbacked assertions. For example, the statement that "The Federal Reserve Board did not create the depression.." is unsupported by any evidence, justification or reference to an acknowledged holiday. That statement might be true (although followers of Milton Friedman would, of course, disagree), but it is presented only as the unsupported opinion of an unknown writer and as such is of little value to the reader. Such unbacked assertions fall short of the standard that should be set by a reputable encyclopedia, and until they have been eliminated from this article, it should not be considered for approval. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 15:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:44, 10 January 2009
This is entitrely by Richard Jensen (some it appeared in Wikipedia). Richard Jensen 01:47, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
Economic history or economic gossip?
This article contains a number of unbacked assertions. For example, the statement that "The Federal Reserve Board did not create the depression.." is unsupported by any evidence, justification or reference to an acknowledged holiday. That statement might be true (although followers of Milton Friedman would, of course, disagree), but it is presented only as the unsupported opinion of an unknown writer and as such is of little value to the reader. Such unbacked assertions fall short of the standard that should be set by a reputable encyclopedia, and until they have been eliminated from this article, it should not be considered for approval. Nick Gardner 15:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Business Developing Articles
- Business Nonstub Articles
- Business Internal Articles
- Economics Developing Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- History tag