Young earth creationism: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati
No edit summary
imported>Nancy Sculerati
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Young earth creationism''' is a religious belief in fundamental Christianity regarding the origin of the universe and life on earth. Basing their understanding of the world on a literal interpretation of the book of [[Genesis]] in the [[Bible]],  proponents argue that the earth is only 6000 - 10, 000 years old.   
'''Young earth creationism''' is a religious belief in fundamental Christianity regarding the origin of the universe and life on earth. Basing their understanding of the world on a literal interpretation of the book of [[Genesis]] in the [[Bible]],  proponents argue that the earth is only 6000 - 10, 000 years old.   


In the United States, the Scopes trail (1925) had turned literal interpretations of the Bible into laughing stock, and alienated some religious fundamentalists who declared Darwinism was a profound source of evil.  Young earth creationism was developed by two American theologians in the early 1960s, John C. Whitcomb, Jr. and Henry M. Morris, in ''The Genesis Flood'' (1961).  They in turn borrowed heavily (without attribution) George McCready Price, a self-taught Seventh-day Adventist author of ''The New Geology'' (1923). Price was not trying to interpret the Bible; he was trying to justify the visions of [[Ellen G. White]], the founder of Seventh Day Adventism. Whitcomb and Morris modified Price's work by  dropping references to Adventism and adding a Baptist interpretation to Price's theory that a great flood had created all the fossils. The young earth creationism movement in the United States draws on a traditional Southern rural evangelical culture and exhibits a passionate embrace of a , seeing alternative interpretations, in some cases, as being proposed by minions of Satan.  Thus the creationists excommunicated adherents of the idea that "days" in Genesis meant epochs, not 24-hour units. The movement is largely confined to Protestant [[fundamentalism|fundamentalists]], especially in the United States and Australia. The theory is most popular among militant [[Southern Baptists]] and [[Missouri Synod Lutherans]].  Adherence to these beliefs have separated the yound earth creationism  proponents from more moderate fundamentalist Christians in internecine theological battles.<ref> Numbers 2006</ref>   
In the United States, widespread public attention towards the [[Scopes trial]] (1925) had turned literal interpretations of the Bible into laughing stock, and alienated some religious fundamentalists who declared Darwinism was a profound source of evil.  Young earth creationism was developed by two American theologians in the early 1960s, John C. Whitcomb, Jr. and Henry M. Morris, in ''The Genesis Flood'' (1961).  They in turn borrowed heavily (without attribution) George McCready Price, a self-taught Seventh-day Adventist author of ''The New Geology'' (1923). Price was not trying to interpret the Bible; he was trying to justify the visions of [[Ellen G. White]], the founder of Seventh Day Adventism. Whitcomb and Morris modified Price's work by  dropping references to Adventism and adding a Baptist interpretation to Price's theory that a great flood had created all the fossils. The young earth creationism movement in the United States draws on a traditional Southern rural evangelical culture and exhibits a passionate embrace of a , seeing alternative interpretations, in some cases, as being proposed by minions of Satan.  Thus the creationists excommunicated adherents of the idea that "days" in Genesis meant epochs, not 24-hour units. The movement is largely confined to Protestant [[fundamentalism|fundamentalists]], especially in the United States and Australia. The theory is most popular among militant [[Southern Baptists]] and [[Missouri Synod Lutherans]].  Adherence to these beliefs have separated the yound earth creationism  proponents from more moderate fundamentalist Christians in internecine theological battles.<ref> Numbers 2006</ref>   


The creationist chronology was originally developed in the 17th century. Bishop Ussher, an Anglican, in 1651 argued that Adam’s birth came at 9 AM on October 23, 4004 BC, and his chronology and appeared in English bibles starting in 1701.<ref>However, the year 4004 BC was already well known to theologians.  J. G. C. M. Fuller, "A date to remember: 4004 BC," ''Earth sciences history'' 2005, vol. 24, no1, pp. 5-14 </ref> The 4004 date was abandoned in the 1870s by the more liberal theologians, and in 1890-1920 was abandoned by the conservatives and fundamentalists, who concluded the Bible does NOT speak to the age of the earth or the dates of Adam. <ref> Numbers (2000)</ref>  Activists, especially in Australia, claim several supporters have credentials as scientists. <ref>See [http://www.creationists.org/outstanding.html List of Creation Scientists] </ref>  Few activists have training in biology and none in geology, let alone research experience, but they are bitterly opposed to what they call "Darwinism," and indeed ridicule and attack modern biology at every opportunity. They claim God has revealed the truth to them and there is no need for research.
The creationist chronology was originally developed in the 17th century. Bishop Ussher, an Anglican, in 1651 argued that Adam’s birth came at 9 AM on October 23, 4004 BC, and his chronology and appeared in English bibles starting in 1701.<ref>However, the year 4004 BC was already well known to theologians.  J. G. C. M. Fuller, "A date to remember: 4004 BC," ''Earth sciences history'' 2005, vol. 24, no1, pp. 5-14 </ref> The 4004 date was abandoned in the 1870s by the more liberal theologians, and in 1890-1920 was abandoned by the conservatives and fundamentalists, who concluded the Bible does NOT speak to the age of the earth or the dates of Adam. <ref> Numbers (2000)</ref>  Activists, especially in Australia, claim several supporters have credentials as scientists. <ref>See [http://www.creationists.org/outstanding.html List of Creation Scientists] </ref>  Few activists have training in biology and none in geology, let alone research experience, but they are bitterly opposed to what they call "Darwinism," and indeed ridicule and attack modern biology at every opportunity. They claim God has revealed the truth to them and there is no need for research.

Revision as of 17:32, 29 May 2007

Young earth creationism is a religious belief in fundamental Christianity regarding the origin of the universe and life on earth. Basing their understanding of the world on a literal interpretation of the book of Genesis in the Bible, proponents argue that the earth is only 6000 - 10, 000 years old.

In the United States, widespread public attention towards the Scopes trial (1925) had turned literal interpretations of the Bible into laughing stock, and alienated some religious fundamentalists who declared Darwinism was a profound source of evil. Young earth creationism was developed by two American theologians in the early 1960s, John C. Whitcomb, Jr. and Henry M. Morris, in The Genesis Flood (1961). They in turn borrowed heavily (without attribution) George McCready Price, a self-taught Seventh-day Adventist author of The New Geology (1923). Price was not trying to interpret the Bible; he was trying to justify the visions of Ellen G. White, the founder of Seventh Day Adventism. Whitcomb and Morris modified Price's work by dropping references to Adventism and adding a Baptist interpretation to Price's theory that a great flood had created all the fossils. The young earth creationism movement in the United States draws on a traditional Southern rural evangelical culture and exhibits a passionate embrace of a , seeing alternative interpretations, in some cases, as being proposed by minions of Satan. Thus the creationists excommunicated adherents of the idea that "days" in Genesis meant epochs, not 24-hour units. The movement is largely confined to Protestant fundamentalists, especially in the United States and Australia. The theory is most popular among militant Southern Baptists and Missouri Synod Lutherans. Adherence to these beliefs have separated the yound earth creationism proponents from more moderate fundamentalist Christians in internecine theological battles.[1]

The creationist chronology was originally developed in the 17th century. Bishop Ussher, an Anglican, in 1651 argued that Adam’s birth came at 9 AM on October 23, 4004 BC, and his chronology and appeared in English bibles starting in 1701.[2] The 4004 date was abandoned in the 1870s by the more liberal theologians, and in 1890-1920 was abandoned by the conservatives and fundamentalists, who concluded the Bible does NOT speak to the age of the earth or the dates of Adam. [3] Activists, especially in Australia, claim several supporters have credentials as scientists. [4] Few activists have training in biology and none in geology, let alone research experience, but they are bitterly opposed to what they call "Darwinism," and indeed ridicule and attack modern biology at every opportunity. They claim God has revealed the truth to them and there is no need for research.


The scientific community as a whole rejects young earth creationism. In addition, religious creationists who believe in old earth creationism also reject the assertion that the earth is only approximately 6000 years old.

Young earth creationists allege that the evidence supporting their theories has been suppressed by mainstream science, and occasionally have brought lawsuits alleging censorship, one of them by Robert V. Gentry. Believers in 2007 opened the Creation Museum theme park near Cincinnati, Ohio, showing early humans at play alongside vegetarian dinosaurs.[5] Other groups in the United States have had similar plans. The "Creation Discovery Center, a museum with exhibits on Noah's flood, the Ice Age and the dinosaurs (featured in the antediluvian room in a mural with Adam and Eve)" was opened by Creation Studies Institute, a Fort Lauderdale, Fla.-based ministry that promotes young earth creationism (Creationism 'lite'; 'Intelligent design' proponents marry God and evolution, The Record (Bergen County, NJ), August 28, 2005 Sunday, All Editions, OPINION; Pg. O01, 1680 words, By ALEXANDRA ALTER, Wire Services).

Notes

  1. ↑ Numbers 2006
  2. ↑ However, the year 4004 BC was already well known to theologians. J. G. C. M. Fuller, "A date to remember: 4004 BC," Earth sciences history 2005, vol. 24, no1, pp. 5-14
  3. ↑ Numbers (2000)
  4. ↑ See List of Creation Scientists
  5. ↑ Associated Press, "New Bible-Based Museum Has Dinosaurs," in New York Times May 26, 2007 at [1]

Bibliography

  • Numbers, Ronald L. The Creationists (2nd ed. 2006)
    • James D. Bratt, "History of Brief Time" Reviews in American History, Vol. 22, No. 2 (Jun., 1994), pp. 335-339. (review of Numbers, 1992 edition. online at JSTOR
  • Numbers, Ronald L. "The Most Important Biblical Discovery of Our Time": William Henry Green and the Demise of Ussher's Chronology," Church History, Vol. 69, No. 2 (Jun., 2000), pp. 257-276 in JSTOR

External links

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Young_earth_creationism&oldid=235721"