Talk:Books of the Bible: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tim McCully
No edit summary
imported>Tim McCully
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
:I'm not so sure WP can claim credit for the contents of this table, Tim. ;-)  The intro is another matter.  --[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 01:43, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
:I'm not so sure WP can claim credit for the contents of this table, Tim. ;-)  The intro is another matter.  --[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 01:43, 16 May 2007 (CDT)


:Stephen, you seem to say someone else may deserve credit for this table. What should I do about that concern? What is the next step to getting this ready for approval? I guess I should check the links and see that they all still work, and that agree at some level with the table content?--[[User:Tim McCully|Tim McCully]] 00:10, 21 May 2007 (CDT)
:Stephen, you seem to say someone else may deserve credit for this table. What should I do about that concern? What is the next step to getting this ready for approval? I guess I should check the links and see that they all still work, and that their content agrees at some level with the table?--[[User:Tim McCully|Tim McCully]] 00:10, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 23:19, 20 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Books of the Bible"
Workgroup category or categories Religion Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by David Martin 10:22, 18 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Well I gave up on building this complex table from scratch, and copied verbatim everything from the Wikipedia equivalent at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Books_of_the_Bible. ----Tim McCully 00:09, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

I'm not so sure WP can claim credit for the contents of this table, Tim. ;-) The intro is another matter. --Stephen Ewen 01:43, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
Stephen, you seem to say someone else may deserve credit for this table. What should I do about that concern? What is the next step to getting this ready for approval? I guess I should check the links and see that they all still work, and that their content agrees at some level with the table?--Tim McCully 00:10, 21 May 2007 (CDT)