Talk:Greatest common divisor: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→highest common factor?: new section) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
: That's what the article says. Are you suggesting that there's some difference between what you wrote above and what the article says? [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 09:38, 16 July 2007 (CDT) | : That's what the article says. Are you suggesting that there's some difference between what you wrote above and what the article says? [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 09:38, 16 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
== highest common factor? == | |||
In number theory, I never read the term "highest common factor", | |||
but my Oxford dictionary and google seem to know it quite well. | |||
Is this perhaps a term used at school level? [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:41, 26 June 2009
Example is redundant
Oops, maybe I shouldn't have put in an example of Euclid's algorithm, since such an example is already given on the Euclid's algorithm page. --Catherine Woodgold 08:38, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
Why so complicate?
So for the gcd you have take take the smallest exponents: :
lcm is similar: You have to take the gratest exponents: :
--arbol01 19:01, 15 July 2007 (CDT)
- That's what the article says. Are you suggesting that there's some difference between what you wrote above and what the article says? Michael Hardy 09:38, 16 July 2007 (CDT)
highest common factor?
In number theory, I never read the term "highest common factor", but my Oxford dictionary and google seem to know it quite well. Is this perhaps a term used at school level? Peter Schmitt 23:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)