Talk:Natural family planning: Difference between revisions
imported>Catherine Woodgold (Primer) |
imported>Catherine Woodgold (Possible ways to structure the article) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Years ago I co-authored this Primer on natural family planning: [http://web.ncf.ca/an588/nfp.html]. It could be a source of information and links. (Not sure about copyright.) --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 13:11, 5 May 2007 (CDT) | Years ago I co-authored this Primer on natural family planning: [http://web.ncf.ca/an588/nfp.html]. It could be a source of information and links. (Not sure about copyright.) --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 13:11, 5 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Possible ways to structure the article == | |||
Possible ways to structure the article include: | |||
*Following the history of NPF (Natural Family Planning) | |||
*In order of the stages of a woman's life | |||
*In order of the phases of the menstrual cycle (but these two woman-focussed structures could put too little emphasis on men's role) | |||
*From most effective to least effective, or vice versa (there are problems with either structure) | |||
*Divided up by purpose: avoiding pregancy, achieving pregnancy, health issues, religious issues etc. | |||
*Other? | |||
Perhaps of the above I prefer in order of the phases of the menstrual cycle, i.e. discussing calendar rhythm first, then mucus-only methods, then temperature methods, and miscellaneous other stuff afterwards, e.g. while breastfeeding, after coming off the pill, etc. But I'm open to other ideas about how to structure it. --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 09:29, 6 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:29, 6 May 2007
References
Stanford JB. Lemaire JC. Thurman PB. Women's interest in natural family planning. [Journal Article] Journal of Family Practice. 46(1):65-71, 1998 Jan. UI: 9451372
Visness CM. Kennedy KI. The frequency of coitus during breastfeeding. [Journal Article. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.] Birth. 24(4):253-7, 1997 Dec. UI: 9460317
Kambic RT. Lamprecht V. Calendar rhythm efficacy: a review. [Journal Article. Meta-Analysis. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.] Advances in Contraception. 12(2):123-8, 1996 Jun. UI: 8863907
Hilgers TW. Pregnancy and the timing of intercourse.[comment]. [Comment. Letter] New England Journal of Medicine. 334(19):1267; author reply 1267-8, 1996 May 9. UI: 8606727
Girard M. Natural family planning.[comment]. [Comment. Letter] Lancet. 346(8977):775; author reply 775-6, 1995 Sep 16. UI: 7658892
Primer
Years ago I co-authored this Primer on natural family planning: [1]. It could be a source of information and links. (Not sure about copyright.) --Catherine Woodgold 13:11, 5 May 2007 (CDT)
Possible ways to structure the article
Possible ways to structure the article include:
- Following the history of NPF (Natural Family Planning)
- In order of the stages of a woman's life
- In order of the phases of the menstrual cycle (but these two woman-focussed structures could put too little emphasis on men's role)
- From most effective to least effective, or vice versa (there are problems with either structure)
- Divided up by purpose: avoiding pregancy, achieving pregnancy, health issues, religious issues etc.
- Other?
Perhaps of the above I prefer in order of the phases of the menstrual cycle, i.e. discussing calendar rhythm first, then mucus-only methods, then temperature methods, and miscellaneous other stuff afterwards, e.g. while breastfeeding, after coming off the pill, etc. But I'm open to other ideas about how to structure it. --Catherine Woodgold 09:29, 6 May 2007 (CDT)