Talk:Antitrust: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tony Cole
imported>Tony Cole
Line 12: Line 12:


== Blue Sky Laws ==
== Blue Sky Laws ==
I have removed this empty header from the article for now, as Blue Sky laws are generally focused on preventinf securities fraud, rather than serving any purpose which particularly serves the antitrust regime. They should really be the subject of their own article, in any event. [[User:Brian Dean Abramson|Brian Dean Abramson]] 11:31, 12 May 2007 (CDT)


Sorry, rather silly laxness on my account.  I'm actually in the middle of constructing courses on both antitrust and securities, and apparently was not paying too much attention to what I was doing when I stuck the headers in.  You're absolutely right, it doesn't belong here at all.  [[User:Tony Cole|Tony Cole]] 08:45, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
Sorry, rather silly laxness on my account.  I'm actually in the middle of constructing courses on both antitrust and securities, and apparently was not paying too much attention to what I was doing when I stuck the headers in.  You're absolutely right, it doesn't belong here at all.  [[User:Tony Cole|Tony Cole]] 08:45, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
I have removed this empty header from the article for now, as Blue Sky laws are generally focused on preventinf securities fraud, rather than serving any purpose which particularly serves the antitrust regime. They should really be the subject of their own article, in any event. [[User:Brian Dean Abramson|Brian Dean Abramson]] 11:31, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 07:45, 25 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Antitrust"
Workgroup category or categories Law Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Versuri 07:53, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Blue Sky Laws

I have removed this empty header from the article for now, as Blue Sky laws are generally focused on preventinf securities fraud, rather than serving any purpose which particularly serves the antitrust regime. They should really be the subject of their own article, in any event. Brian Dean Abramson 11:31, 12 May 2007 (CDT)


Sorry, rather silly laxness on my account. I'm actually in the middle of constructing courses on both antitrust and securities, and apparently was not paying too much attention to what I was doing when I stuck the headers in. You're absolutely right, it doesn't belong here at all. Tony Cole 08:45, 25 May 2007 (CDT)