Talk:Star Wars: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen |
imported>Stephen Ewen |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:::::Good question. Right now there is definitely some confusion about this issue. My opinion is that general, mass-market film topics should not be part of visual arts. I am going to post a new topic on the forums in the "Editorial workgroups and granularity" section so we can get more people in on the discussion. --[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 00:32, 30 May 2007 (CDT) | :::::Good question. Right now there is definitely some confusion about this issue. My opinion is that general, mass-market film topics should not be part of visual arts. I am going to post a new topic on the forums in the "Editorial workgroups and granularity" section so we can get more people in on the discussion. --[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 00:32, 30 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
This is going to be one of those issue that defy purvey of one workgroup to be able to approve, of which | This is going to be one of those issue that defy purvey of one workgroup to be able to approve, of which [[globalization]] is my favorite example. I suggest a way is to jointly place article under purvey of more than one workgroup. Approving requires sign off by them all. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 04:33, 30 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 04:33, 30 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Visual Arts Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | David Martin 19:56, 14 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Before We Jump on the bandwagon
Before we jump on the "Wikipedia bandwagon" and call the attention of all the Star Wars fans, can we get some guidance on what's notable on Citizendium and what's not? I think a detailed article on Star Wars ad its impact on society is all that's necessary, with a prominent link to the "Wookiepedia" which would answer any further questions readers might have. Wikipedia's huge section on Star Wars and Star Trek is really overboard, as there is a "Star Wars" wiki (Wookiepedia) and there is a Star Trek wiki (Memory Alpha) that would cover the nitty-gritty stuff about both subjects. Eric M Gearhart
- Agreed -- but perhaps we could do something better here. There are fans of Lucas's films, and there are scholars of film studies and cultural studies who could write a thoughtful, historically contextualized entry about these films which would be far more in-depth in its own way, and would not be redundant with fan-written wikis. Russell Potter 07:30, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
- Exactly. A high-level view of the Trilogy, from film buffs that discussed e.g. how it influenced a culture and a generation, etc. would be much more encyclopedic than a "shrine to Star Wars/Star Trek." Unfortunately I'm a SciFi geek, not a film major hehe.
The more in-depth "Obi Wan's Light saber is blue" / "In 'The Search for Spock' Spock dies and then comes back to life" details can be left to movie-specific wikis in my opinion Eric M Gearhart
- Exactly. A high-level view of the Trilogy, from film buffs that discussed e.g. how it influenced a culture and a generation, etc. would be much more encyclopedic than a "shrine to Star Wars/Star Trek." Unfortunately I'm a SciFi geek, not a film major hehe.
- I think films/movies go into visual arts, but they have little to no guidance on their workgroup page. Matt Mahlmann 17:32, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
- Well, that's what I thought, too, but film seems to be in "media". There would appear to be some crossover here, but where *should* "the movies" be? Aleta Curry 21:33, 29 May 2007 (CDT)
- I think films/movies go into visual arts, but they have little to no guidance on their workgroup page. Matt Mahlmann 17:32, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
- Good question. Right now there is definitely some confusion about this issue. My opinion is that general, mass-market film topics should not be part of visual arts. I am going to post a new topic on the forums in the "Editorial workgroups and granularity" section so we can get more people in on the discussion. --Eric Winesett 00:32, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
This is going to be one of those issue that defy purvey of one workgroup to be able to approve, of which globalization is my favorite example. I suggest a way is to jointly place article under purvey of more than one workgroup. Approving requires sign off by them all. Stephen Ewen 04:33, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
- Visual Arts Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Visual Arts Advanced Articles
- Visual Arts Nonstub Articles
- Visual Arts Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Visual Arts Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Visual Arts Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Visual Arts Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Visual Arts External Articles
- Visual Arts Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Visual Arts Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup