Talk:Sue Savage-Rumbaugh: Difference between revisions
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>John Stephenson (partial revert) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==Attribution== | ==Attribution== | ||
A note to point out that, although this article is from Wikipedia, I wrote the second paragraph there and the rest has been completely changed. See the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sue_Savage-Rumbaugh&action=history Wikipedia history]. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:25, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | A note to point out that, although this article is from Wikipedia, I wrote the second paragraph there and the rest has been completely changed. See the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sue_Savage-Rumbaugh&action=history Wikipedia history]. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:25, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Partial revert== | |||
I reverted much of [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Sue_Savage-Rumbaugh&diff=100575708&oldid=100213372 this edit] because it introduced one factual inaccuracy and, in my view, went too far in making a claim that non-human apes have true linguistic ability. In detail: (1) bonobos are not closer to us than common chimps - they are equally related to us; (2) the claim that Kanzi's use of the keyboard constitutes ''linguistic'' communication, not just communication, is disputed; (3) I don't think the controversy just boils down to different definitions of language and evolution because, for example, Savage-Rumbaugh works in different theoretical frameworks from mainstream linguists, e.g. behaviorism. I will try to fill in some gaps in the article. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 07:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:34, 16 September 2009
Attribution
A note to point out that, although this article is from Wikipedia, I wrote the second paragraph there and the rest has been completely changed. See the Wikipedia history. John Stephenson 03:25, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
Partial revert
I reverted much of this edit because it introduced one factual inaccuracy and, in my view, went too far in making a claim that non-human apes have true linguistic ability. In detail: (1) bonobos are not closer to us than common chimps - they are equally related to us; (2) the claim that Kanzi's use of the keyboard constitutes linguistic communication, not just communication, is disputed; (3) I don't think the controversy just boils down to different definitions of language and evolution because, for example, Savage-Rumbaugh works in different theoretical frameworks from mainstream linguists, e.g. behaviorism. I will try to fill in some gaps in the article. John Stephenson 07:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Psychology Developing Articles
- Psychology Nonstub Articles
- Psychology Internal Articles
- Linguistics Developing Articles
- Linguistics Nonstub Articles
- Linguistics Internal Articles