Talk:Verifiability theory of meaning: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter J. King
(problems)
 
imported>Petréa Mitchell
(Article checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Verifiability theory of meaning
|                cat1 = Philosophy
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 4
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 21:57, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
}}
First, it's not clear to me that this article is needed; the "verifiability theory of meaning" is the verification principle.  The article starts by saying that the former is only derived from the latter, but goes on (correctly) to treat them as the same.
First, it's not clear to me that this article is needed; the "verifiability theory of meaning" is the verification principle.  The article starts by saying that the former is only derived from the latter, but goes on (correctly) to treat them as the same.



Revision as of 20:57, 3 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Verifiability theory of meaning"
Workgroup category or categories Philosophy Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 21:57, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





First, it's not clear to me that this article is needed; the "verifiability theory of meaning" is the verification principle. The article starts by saying that the former is only derived from the latter, but goes on (correctly) to treat them as the same.

Secondly, it needs a lot of work in any case. Aside from copy-editing issues, it contains much rather vague gesturing at what unnamed people have suggested, argued, etc., in unnamed places. I've removed a couple of extreme cases, but more needs to be done.

Ah, I've just discovered that it's a Wikipedia article, which was turned into a redirect to Verificationist. --Peter J. King  Talk  09:15, 9 April 2007 (CDT)