Talk:Unix: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Eric M Gearhart (Changed "Underlinked" to no... from looking at "What links here" this article definitely isn't underlinked) |
imported>Eric M Gearhart (Needs dramatic prose and such) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Should this article dip into "The History of Unix"? Or should that be on its own article? The History of Unix could easily fill up an entire other article... --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 12:12, 31 March 2007 (CDT) | Should this article dip into "The History of Unix"? Or should that be on its own article? The History of Unix could easily fill up an entire other article... --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 12:12, 31 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
:OK in reply to myself this article is in dire need of a good, compelling History section. --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] | |||
== Emacs and vi? == | == Emacs and vi? == |
Revision as of 15:29, 14 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Computers Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --Eric M Gearhart 12:08, 31 March 2007 (CDT)--, Petréa Mitchell 11:06, 1 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Should this article dip into "The History of Unix"? Or should that be on its own article? The History of Unix could easily fill up an entire other article... --Eric M Gearhart 12:12, 31 March 2007 (CDT)
- OK in reply to myself this article is in dire need of a good, compelling History section. --Eric M Gearhart
Emacs and vi?
Emacs and vi shouldn't be listed, should they? This is Unix software, not GNU. Please correct me if I'm wrong, as I've only ever used the free Unix toolkits. --Joshua David Williams 10:47, 6 April 2007 (CDT)
- Yes that is true I suppose... vi was on the list, so naturally to "balance the Force" I added emacs. What do we define as "Unix" and "not Unix" though? The original "Kerrighan and Ritchie Unix" is Unix... anything after is not? Or should we have a list of tools at all? Hmm. --Eric M Gearhart 11:00, 6 April 2007 (CDT)
- Perhaps we should split the list into two articles; GNU tools and Unix tools. --Joshua David Williams 11:05, 6 April 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Computers Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Computers Advanced Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Computers Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Computers External Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup