Talk:René Descartes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Kevin M I Schutte No edit summary |
imported>Daniel Demaret No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:A few substantive changes appear to have been made from the Wikipedia version, and from what I can tell they ''are'' improvements (including the removal of quite a few pointless editorial comments). I suppose this only indicates how unsatisfactory Wikipedia articles can be. Hopefully, we can make it worth reading. - [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:39, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | :A few substantive changes appear to have been made from the Wikipedia version, and from what I can tell they ''are'' improvements (including the removal of quite a few pointless editorial comments). I suppose this only indicates how unsatisfactory Wikipedia articles can be. Hopefully, we can make it worth reading. - [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:39, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Interestingly, I just saw some additions in wikipedia that mirror the changes I put into this article. Possible better written, since I am not a writer. Is it possible that we being copied by wikipedia now? [[User:Daniel Demaret|Daniel Demaret]] 02:53, 13 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 01:53, 13 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | History Workgroup, Mathematics Workgroup, Philosophy Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Kevin M I Schutte 21:39, 8 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
This is just an uploaded Wikipedia article; Simon, has it been changed?
As someone who studied and taught Descartes quite a bit, I can tell you that we can do far better than this. --Larry Sanger 11:53, 26 February 2007 (CST)
- A few substantive changes appear to have been made from the Wikipedia version, and from what I can tell they are improvements (including the removal of quite a few pointless editorial comments). I suppose this only indicates how unsatisfactory Wikipedia articles can be. Hopefully, we can make it worth reading. - Kevin M I Schutte 21:39, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
Interestingly, I just saw some additions in wikipedia that mirror the changes I put into this article. Possible better written, since I am not a writer. Is it possible that we being copied by wikipedia now? Daniel Demaret 02:53, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- History Category Check
- General Category Check
- Mathematics Category Check
- Philosophy Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Mathematics Advanced Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Philosophy Advanced Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Mathematics Developed Articles
- Philosophy Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- Mathematics Stub Articles
- Philosophy Stub Articles
- External Articles
- History External Articles
- Mathematics External Articles
- Philosophy External Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles
- History Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Mathematics Cleanup
- Philosophy Cleanup