Countable set: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Johnson No edit summary |
imported>Nick Johnson mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[mathematics]], a [[set]] X is said to be '''enumerable''' if there exists a [[one-to-one]] [[map|mapping]] from the set of [[integers]] [[onto]] X. By the definition, an enumerable set has the same [[cardinality]] as [[integers|the set of integers]]. | In [[mathematics]], a [[set]] X is said to be '''enumerable''' or '''countable''' if there exists a [[one-to-one]] [[map|mapping]] from the set of [[integers]] [[onto]] X. By the definition, an enumerable set has the same [[cardinality]] as [[integers|the set of integers]]. | ||
Enumerable sets are subject to many useful properties. [[inductive proof|Inductive proofs]] rely upon enumeration of induction variables. | Enumerable sets are subject to many useful properties. [[inductive proof|Inductive proofs]] rely upon enumeration of induction variables. |
Revision as of 12:41, 22 February 2007
In mathematics, a set X is said to be enumerable or countable if there exists a one-to-one mapping from the set of integers onto X. By the definition, an enumerable set has the same cardinality as the set of integers.
Enumerable sets are subject to many useful properties. Inductive proofs rely upon enumeration of induction variables.
Examples of Enumerable Sets
The set of rational numbers is an enumerable set. Envision a table which contains all rational numbers (below). One can make a function that dovetails back and forth across the entire area of the table. This function enumerates all rational numbers.
0 | 1 | 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
The union of the set of integers with any finite set is enumerable. For instance, given the finite set
With cardinality n, this function will enumerate all elements of :
Counter Examples
The set of real numbers is not enumerable, which we will prove by contraction. Suppose you had an infinitely long list of all real numbers (below), in no particular order, expressed in decimal notation. This table, itself, is an enumeration function. We demonstrate the absurdity of such a list by finding a number which is not in the list.
Order | Real Number |
---|---|
0 | 0.32847... |
1 | 0.48284... |
2 | 0.89438... |
3 | 0.00154... |
4 | 0.32425... |
... | ... |
Specifically, we construct a number which differs from each real number by at least one digit, using this procedure: If the ith digit after the decimal place in the ith number in the list is a five, then our constructed number will have a four in the ith place, otherwise a five. From our example list, we would construct the number 0.55544... By construction, this number is a real number, but not in our list. As a result, the enumeration function is not onto.