Contact language: Difference between revisions
imported>John Stephenson (Lingua franca - modified this) |
imported>John Stephenson (spacing and categorisation) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
While contact languages are necessarily lingua francas, not all lingua francas are contact languages. Other types include ''[[trade language]]s'' (e.g. [[Swahili language|Swahili]] in [[East Africa]]), ''[[international language]]s'' (e.g. [[English language|English]] in much of the world) and ''[[auxiliary language]]s'' (languages artificially designed for a purpose, such as [[Esperanto]] or [[Basic English]]).<ref>Samarin (1968: 661).</ref> | While contact languages are necessarily lingua francas, not all lingua francas are contact languages. Other types include ''[[trade language]]s'' (e.g. [[Swahili language|Swahili]] in [[East Africa]]), ''[[international language]]s'' (e.g. [[English language|English]] in much of the world) and ''[[auxiliary language]]s'' (languages artificially designed for a purpose, such as [[Esperanto]] or [[Basic English]]).<ref>Samarin (1968: 661).</ref> | ||
==Pidgins and Creoles== | ==Pidgins and Creoles== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
In a minority of cases, an extending a pidgin may lead to [[creolisation]]. This occurs when a pidgin becomes the first language of [[children]], the resulting native language being a creole. This new language is inevitably more complex than the original pidgin; there is no evidence that creoles are in any way deficient. For example, not only are creoles used for a wide variety of purposes, but works written in conventional languages have been translated into creole versions.<ref>See an example of a [http://www.worldscriptures.org/pages/tokpisin.html Tok Pisin Bible] and a [[bilingualism|bilingual]] [http://www.geocities.com/yotaino/langwij.html Jamaican Creole-English website].</ref><ref>See Sebba (1997), for a comprehensive introduction to pidgins and creoles; and Wardhaugh (2006: 58-87) for discussion on these languages as lingua francas.</ref> | In a minority of cases, an extending a pidgin may lead to [[creolisation]]. This occurs when a pidgin becomes the first language of [[children]], the resulting native language being a creole. This new language is inevitably more complex than the original pidgin; there is no evidence that creoles are in any way deficient. For example, not only are creoles used for a wide variety of purposes, but works written in conventional languages have been translated into creole versions.<ref>See an example of a [http://www.worldscriptures.org/pages/tokpisin.html Tok Pisin Bible] and a [[bilingualism|bilingual]] [http://www.geocities.com/yotaino/langwij.html Jamaican Creole-English website].</ref><ref>See Sebba (1997), for a comprehensive introduction to pidgins and creoles; and Wardhaugh (2006: 58-87) for discussion on these languages as lingua francas.</ref> | ||
==Post-contact== | ==Post-contact== | ||
| Line 20: | Line 18: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 29: | Line 26: | ||
[[Category:Linguistics]] | [[Category:Linguistics]] | ||
[[Category:Linguistics Workgroup]] | [[Category:Linguistics Workgroup]] | ||
[[Category:Linguistics Live]] | [[Category:Linguistics Live]] | ||
[[Category:CZ Live]] | [[Category:CZ Live]] | ||
Revision as of 01:41, 5 April 2007
A contact language is a type of language which is used when people who share no native language need to communicate. Such languages are one type of lingua franca, a general term meaning a language used between groups who have no common tongue.
While contact languages are necessarily lingua francas, not all lingua francas are contact languages. Other types include trade languages (e.g. Swahili in East Africa), international languages (e.g. English in much of the world) and auxiliary languages (languages artificially designed for a purpose, such as Esperanto or Basic English).[1]
Pidgins and Creoles
Very often, pidgin and creoles are contact languages. A pidgin is a language that is created through a contact situation - typically, users employ words from one or more languages they have some knowledge of, underlain by the grammar of their own native languages together with attempts to simplify sentences. The result is a rudimentary language with fewer 'rules' than other languages - there are fewer sentence types, for instance, so expressing certain ideas may be difficult. The pidgin is fine-tuned to the immediate needs of the speakers, who may primarily use it for bartering, friendly introductions, or some other specific purpose. It therefore has no immediate need to be elaborated unless it proves useful for the speech community to develop an extended pidgin, used for more purposes and with increasingly rigid rules.
One example of extended pidgins is Fanagalo, used in some South African mines, and which is actually taught in underground classrooms to miners of different linguistic backgrounds. Another is Tok Pisin, which is widely used throughout Papua New Guinea, in print as well as in conversation.[2]
In a minority of cases, an extending a pidgin may lead to creolisation. This occurs when a pidgin becomes the first language of children, the resulting native language being a creole. This new language is inevitably more complex than the original pidgin; there is no evidence that creoles are in any way deficient. For example, not only are creoles used for a wide variety of purposes, but works written in conventional languages have been translated into creole versions.[3][4]
Post-contact
The term contact language is also sometimes applied to languages which originated in a contact situation, but which are no longer used out of the necessity to communicate. For example, most creoles have emerged from such situations, but may no longer be used as a lingua franca - such as in Jamaica, where the local creole[5] is used in informal situations, and a variety closer to Standard English for speaking to outsiders.[6]
Footnotes
- ↑ Samarin (1968: 661).
- ↑ Smith (2002).
- ↑ See an example of a Tok Pisin Bible and a bilingual Jamaican Creole-English website.
- ↑ See Sebba (1997), for a comprehensive introduction to pidgins and creoles; and Wardhaugh (2006: 58-87) for discussion on these languages as lingua francas.
- ↑ Sebba (1997: 204-210).
- ↑ Sebba (1997) labels all pidgins and creoles as contact languages; see title.
References
- Samarin WJ (1968) Lingua francas of the world. In Fishman JA (ed.) Readings in the Sociology of Language. The Hague: Mouton. pp.660-672. ASIN B000I68UJ4.
- Sebba M (1997) Contact Language: Pidgins and Creoles. London: Macmillan. ISBN 90-333-63024-6.
- Smith GP (2002) Growing Up with Tok Pisin: Contact, Creolization, and Change in Papua New Guinea's National Language. London: Battlebridge. ISBN 1-903292-06-9.
- Wardhaugh R (2006) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 6th edition. ISBN 1-4051-3559-X.