Talk:Schrödinger equation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Tribe |
imported>Robert Tito mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Can I suggest some discussion of its physical implications (eg quantized energy levels in atoms) in addition to the math. The first mention in The Feynman lectures on Physics, Volume III, Feynman's red book | Can I suggest some discussion of its physical implications (eg quantized energy levels in atoms) in addition to the math. The first mention in The Feynman lectures on Physics, Volume III, Feynman's red book | ||
is a good model Cheers [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 15:55, 12 February 2007 (CST) | is a good model Cheers [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 15:55, 12 February 2007 (CST) | ||
David, would you mind sticking to biology? (Attention: David has a big nose.) [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 16:53, 12 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 16:53, 12 February 2007
Umlaut
Anyone know how to type the O with a colon over it in Schrodinger...?
- I do not know, but you can always copy-paste. --Alex Halicz (hello) 11:43, 8 February 2007 (CST)
Easy when you are on a MAC, cut and paste when you do not have easy access. Robert Tito | Talk 11:44, 8 February 2007 (CST)
concepts in quantum theory
Can I suggest some discussion of its physical implications (eg quantized energy levels in atoms) in addition to the math. The first mention in The Feynman lectures on Physics, Volume III, Feynman's red book is a good model Cheers David Tribe 15:55, 12 February 2007 (CST) David, would you mind sticking to biology? (Attention: David has a big nose.) Robert Tito | Talk 16:53, 12 February 2007 (CST)