Talk:Scientific misconduct: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Tribe |
imported>Christian Steinbach No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a clean slate article. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 21:27, 27 January 2007 (CST) | This is a clean slate article. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 21:27, 27 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:Rough attemp at an introduction: | |||
:'''Scientific misconduct''' is an accusation levelled at members of the scientific community who have, knowingly or otherwise, undertaken research, or produced results in such a way that ethical questions are raised. Practitioners perceived as being pseudoscientists may also be implicated with scientific misconduct, although the term pseudoscience is often extended to cover areas of alternative medicine and the paranormal whose proponents do not necessarily consider themselves scientists or use the trappings of science. --[[User:Christian Steinbach|Christian Steinbach]] 23:11, 27 January 2007 (CST) | |||
==Frankness about contrary evidence== | ==Frankness about contrary evidence== | ||
Einstein quote | Einstein quote | ||
Revision as of 23:11, 27 January 2007
This is a clean slate article. David Tribe 21:27, 27 January 2007 (CST)
- Rough attemp at an introduction:
- Scientific misconduct is an accusation levelled at members of the scientific community who have, knowingly or otherwise, undertaken research, or produced results in such a way that ethical questions are raised. Practitioners perceived as being pseudoscientists may also be implicated with scientific misconduct, although the term pseudoscience is often extended to cover areas of alternative medicine and the paranormal whose proponents do not necessarily consider themselves scientists or use the trappings of science. --Christian Steinbach 23:11, 27 January 2007 (CST)
Frankness about contrary evidence
Einstein quote
Falsification
Peer review process
Examples to use
The David Baltimore case
MMR vaccine