Talk:Horizontal gene transfer/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris day No edit summary |
imported>David Tribe (url update approval v 1.1) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
One editor approval | One editor approval | ||
{{ToApprove|editor=David Tribe|url | {{ToApprove|editor=David Tribe|url=http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Horizontal_gene_transfer/Draft&oldid=100046089|group=Biology|date=February 20, 2007}} | ||
Uncontroversial edits of typographic errors [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 15:33, 18 February 2007 (CST) | Uncontroversial edits of typographic errors [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 15:33, 18 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Archaeal better than Archeal givin uniform usage Archaea from which it is derived ? [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 15:33, 18 February 2007 (CST) | Archaeal better than Archeal givin uniform usage Archaea from which it is derived ? [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 15:33, 18 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 17:27, 24 February 2007
Version 1.1
One editor approval
 |
Uncontroversial edits of typographic errors David Tribe 15:33, 18 February 2007 (CST) Archaeal better than Archeal givin uniform usage Archaea from which it is derived ? David Tribe 15:33, 18 February 2007 (CST)
Bug?
There is a strange printing bug with this page. It views normally on the Firefox browser but only prints the introduction on my system. Prints OK with IE 7 though. Possibly there is a size limit issue? David Tribe 04:24, 23 January 2007 (CST)
Glitch not present on another system. May be just my Adobe software. David Tribe 19:45, 23 January 2007 (CST)
Spelling and Grammar
I corrected a number of spelling errors and grammatical "errors" in the article. Someone should check that all the changes I made are genuinely corrections. In particular someone should check that the term "even genes for SSU rRNA's" was not intentional. I reverted one change that I made to the spelling of archeal (from archaeal) since I presume it can be spelled either way.
Sadly the other errors also occur in the approved version of the article.
Found a number of minor errors, awkwardnesses, and tried to get citation style right? Hope I got it right David? Its a long and tough article and I'll go through it again. I removed some excess wikilinksand one duplicated reference. Its a very good article and glitches are hard to eliminate completely. Are you happy with the reference appearance? ... I'm not, butI cant see the rule that connects links and spaces so cant get things consistent.... Doooh Gareth Leng 17:22, 18 February 2007 (CST)
OK I've gone through it all again now, and taken out a couple of references that duplicated citations. Found a few typos and altered a number of phrases that I thought could be rendered more clearly. Done my best to make the references look clean. Reduced wikilinks by linking only to first mention.Gareth Leng 04:18, 20 February 2007 (CST)