Talk:Elenchus: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Kevin M I Schutte No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | {{checklist | ||
| abc = Elenchus | | abc = Elenchus | ||
| cat1 = | | cat1 = Classics | ||
| cat2 = | | cat2 = Philosophy | ||
| cat3 = | | cat3 = | ||
| cat_check = y | | cat_check = y | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| underlinked = y | | underlinked = y | ||
| cleanup = y | | cleanup = y | ||
| by = [[User: | | by = [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Asked for category check simply because I wonder how many and which articles about ancient philosophy will be shared with the Classics Workgroup. Perhaps articles about jargon/concepts might be shared. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:00, 17 March 2007 (CDT) | Asked for category check simply because I wonder how many and which articles about ancient philosophy will be shared with the Classics Workgroup. Perhaps articles about jargon/concepts might be shared. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:00, 17 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Is there a reason they wouldn't or shouldn't be shared? (I can't think of one.) I added Classics on the checklist so that maybe someone from there could give us such a reason, if there is one. [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 20:04, 8 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Classics Workgroup, Philosophy Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Kevin M I Schutte 21:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I've added an updated version of a Wikipedia article I wrote on the elechus, which I think is a serviceable starting place for the article (insofar as it is accurate and true, but incomplete). In WP it was awkwardly subsumed under Socratic method. A copyright question: does this need some reference to WP? At the time of writing it is entirely my own work, but perhaps this makes no difference. I'll investigate. Damien Storey 07:48, 21 January 2007 (CST)
Asked for category check simply because I wonder how many and which articles about ancient philosophy will be shared with the Classics Workgroup. Perhaps articles about jargon/concepts might be shared. --Larry Sanger 10:00, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
- Is there a reason they wouldn't or shouldn't be shared? (I can't think of one.) I added Classics on the checklist so that maybe someone from there could give us such a reason, if there is one. Kevin M I Schutte 21:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
- Classics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Philosophy Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Classics Advanced Articles
- Classics Nonstub Articles
- Classics Internal Articles
- Philosophy Advanced Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Classics Developed Articles
- Philosophy Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Classics Developing Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Classics Stub Articles
- Philosophy Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Classics External Articles
- Philosophy External Articles
- Classics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles
- Classics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Philosophy Cleanup
- Cleanup