Talk:Personal computer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Glen Pepicelli (comment) |
imported>ZachPruckowski No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I reorganized the article because I feel as though the primary interest here will be in the computer itself (uses, configuration, etc.), as opposed to the history. As such, coverage of the history can be moved a bit further back. Of course, that's open to discussion --[[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 14:28, 16 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Why not split the history into a separate (future) article? If you think about it the history is going to be HUGE since there are tons of different personal computers. For example the Soviet Union had it own PCs, Amigas and Ataris were popular in Europe, Latin American has some unique ones too. | :Why not split the history into a separate (future) article? If you think about it the history is going to be HUGE since there are tons of different personal computers. For example the Soviet Union had it own PCs, Amigas and Ataris were popular in Europe, Latin American has some unique ones too. | ||
--Glen | --Glen | ||
::Not a bad idea. I may do just that. Or you can, if you want to. I'd also like to split the "early personal computers" out too. Also, please sign with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, because that links to your userpage for you. -- [[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] ([[User_talk:ZachPruckowski|Talk]]) 21:42, 6 February 2007 (CST) | |||
I | |||
==Plans for article? Anyone?== | ==Plans for article? Anyone?== | ||
The History section needs a good bit of clean-up. I'm not really qualified to do that. | The History section needs a good bit of clean-up. I'm not really qualified to do that. | ||
Also, we need to work out the deal with the non-IBM-compatible PCs. I think we want to say something, obviously, but I'm not sold on a huge list like that. --[[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 15:01, 18 January 2007 (CST) | Also, we need to work out the deal with the non-IBM-compatible PCs. I think we want to say something, obviously, but I'm not sold on a huge list like that. --[[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 15:01, 18 January 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 21:42, 6 February 2007
I reorganized the article because I feel as though the primary interest here will be in the computer itself (uses, configuration, etc.), as opposed to the history. As such, coverage of the history can be moved a bit further back. Of course, that's open to discussion --ZachPruckowski 14:28, 16 January 2007 (CST)
- Why not split the history into a separate (future) article? If you think about it the history is going to be HUGE since there are tons of different personal computers. For example the Soviet Union had it own PCs, Amigas and Ataris were popular in Europe, Latin American has some unique ones too.
--Glen
- Not a bad idea. I may do just that. Or you can, if you want to. I'd also like to split the "early personal computers" out too. Also, please sign with ~~~~, because that links to your userpage for you. -- ZachPruckowski (Talk) 21:42, 6 February 2007 (CST)
Plans for article? Anyone?
The History section needs a good bit of clean-up. I'm not really qualified to do that. Also, we need to work out the deal with the non-IBM-compatible PCs. I think we want to say something, obviously, but I'm not sold on a huge list like that. --ZachPruckowski 15:01, 18 January 2007 (CST)