User talk:Stephen Ewen: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen |
imported>Stephen Ewen |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
What is this, the court of Louis XIV? I was annoyed, and I was making that clear, without being abusive. My experience as a journalist and subeditor was relevant to the point I was making. It is true that Wikipedia suffers from an excess of personal abuse, but let us not go to the opposite extreme. Robust debate is part of academic life, as I'm sure you know. [[User:Adam Carr|Adam Carr]] 18:32, 27 February 2007 (CST) | What is this, the court of Louis XIV? I was annoyed, and I was making that clear, without being abusive. My experience as a journalist and subeditor was relevant to the point I was making. It is true that Wikipedia suffers from an excess of personal abuse, but let us not go to the opposite extreme. Robust debate is part of academic life, as I'm sure you know. [[User:Adam Carr|Adam Carr]] 18:32, 27 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:I saw a declaration and an action, no | :I saw a declaration and an action, no debate. That's the point. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 18:42, 27 February 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 18:46, 27 February 2007
Hello Stephen, Thank you for your comments on the Jesus article. I am an agnostic, but wholly support your position, eloquently expressed.Gareth Leng 07:10, 25 January 2007 (CST)
- Thanks, Gareth. Seems like this article could be great training grounds for us CZ citizens. BTW, thanks for contributing to the article what you have thus far. I hope you stick around, and I'll be "seeing" you around. Stephen Ewen 19:09, 25 January 2007 (CST)
- Ah, I see now you are I am "a member of the executive of Citizendium". Cool. What exactly does this mean your role is? Stephen Ewen 19:12, 25 January 2007 (CST)
Saipan
Sure, I would look forward to collaborating. Right now, though, I'm working on the Guadalcanal and Solomon Islands' campaigns and there are enough unfinished articles there to keep me busy with that area for awhile. Charles 00:23, 26 January 2007 (CST)
From Joshua
Stephen, How good to see you here! You should come by Thinking Baptists some time. We'd love to have you back in the discussions. Hope you're doing well! Ph.D. work is slowly sucking the life out of me, but I think I'm over the hump. Joshua Villines 15:29, 26 January 2007 (CST)
Are you a constable Stephen Ive forgotten
David Tribe 02:21, 16 February 2007 (CST)
- No, but I think I would be a very good one and would be pleased to serve that way. Stephen Ewen 02:22, 16 February 2007 (CST)
- I wanted to know if I can leave my keyboard sigh
- My prayers have been granted !! David Tribe 23:16, 25 February 2007 (CST)
- :-) Glad to help! Stephen Ewen 23:18, 25 February 2007 (CST)
- My prayers have been granted !! David Tribe 23:16, 25 February 2007 (CST)
- I wanted to know if I can leave my keyboard sigh
Do you have some religious activity ? David Tribe
- Well, I think it may be wise for the Project to have plenty of constables on hand for especially the public launching, just in case. And I would be more than happy to help lighten your load. I'd rather not nominate myself, however. As for the second question, that is complicated. I am a devoted Christian but certainly would not fit in with most people's stereotypes of what that means. If you click on the link to my thesis on my userpage and read the Preface, that will give you some idea of how I exhibit my values. Also, one can be informed about a person by some of the books they read. I have recently found this book (see some reviews) quite fascinating. Stephen Ewen 02:42, 16 February 2007 (CST)
I don't think we are ready for public release yet. Maybe that's just me though. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 03:03, 16 February 2007 (CST)
- Yes, probably not. Yet see info about at Citizendium_Pilot:Notice_Board under "Slashdotted again". Stephen Ewen 03:11, 16 February 2007 (CST)
bonny hicks
is now protected, it cannot be modified or deleted. I take it according to your protective wish? If you wish to be able to edit the document again ask a constable to remove the edit-lock Robert Tito | Talk 22:59, 18 February 2007 (CST)
- Ok, thank you. Stephen Ewen 23:01, 18 February 2007 (CST)
Julius Axelrod
This is one of my articles that I polished on WP and look after. As I noted, not much changes now that he has died. ScottYoung 06:24, 19 February 2007 (CST)
not a problem
Hey, the way I see it, it is your job to tag as many as you could and my job to double check. That's just team work! You made my job easy, thanks. Matt Innis (Talk) 07:55, 20 February 2007 (CST)
Thanks for your message
Thanks, Stephen- I'm blushing! Nancy Sculerati MD 18:04, 20 February 2007 (CST)
re: Your undergrad anthro thesis
Thanks very much for the offer. I'll post an abstract on my talk page soon (as part of a badly needed reorganization there) and send along a draft of the full document once I get things a little more polished. -- Joe Quick | Talk
author suggestions big write
Stephen,
quite some topics you picked out. these are each HUGE and on some topics work is under way. Is it possible to narrow its scope somewhat (to not doing the same work twice) and prevent double work being done - as in what is needed by the workgroups and do these needs stay in line with what you had in mind. It seems a small effort on these huge omnipotent subjects. Cheers, nice thought tho to drop your ideas as well, and why shouldn't you. Robert Tito | Talk 07:37, 24 February 2007 (CST)
Constabulary
welcome, Steve. May the hat fit you :) Rob
- Thanks, Rob. :-) Stephen Ewen
Anthropology
Thanks for taking the lead on Anthropology. I had you in mind as an exception when I posted my comment on the Big Write page, and I'm glad to see that my intuitions were correct. I still need to finish up a couple of things for the end of the term here (it's a pesky thing, school), but you can expect to see my work to start showing up soon... --Joe Quick | Talk
Advisements
What is this, the court of Louis XIV? I was annoyed, and I was making that clear, without being abusive. My experience as a journalist and subeditor was relevant to the point I was making. It is true that Wikipedia suffers from an excess of personal abuse, but let us not go to the opposite extreme. Robust debate is part of academic life, as I'm sure you know. Adam Carr 18:32, 27 February 2007 (CST)
- I saw a declaration and an action, no debate. That's the point. Stephen Ewen 18:42, 27 February 2007 (CST)