User talk:Christian Liem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Christian Liem No edit summary |
imported>Christian Liem No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== [[Snakebite]] == | |||
Thanks for the spelling help! [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 20:27, 1 January 2007 (CST) | Thanks for the spelling help! [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 20:27, 1 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:Your welcome :) It seems that "venemous" is not really wrong, and is listed in some dictionaries. However it only got 130,000 hits on Google, compared to 2,900,000 for "venomous". I reckon readers would find the latter more familiar. Good article, I actually learned a lot! --[[User:Christian Liem|Christian Liem]] 00:07, 2 January 2007 (CST) | :Your welcome :) It seems that "venemous" is not really wrong, and is listed in some dictionaries. However it only got 130,000 hits on Google, compared to 2,900,000 for "venomous". I reckon readers would find the latter more familiar. Good article, I actually learned a lot! --[[User:Christian Liem|Christian Liem]] 00:07, 2 January 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 00:08, 2 January 2007
Snakebite
Thanks for the spelling help! Nancy Sculerati MD 20:27, 1 January 2007 (CST)
- Your welcome :) It seems that "venemous" is not really wrong, and is listed in some dictionaries. However it only got 130,000 hits on Google, compared to 2,900,000 for "venomous". I reckon readers would find the latter more familiar. Good article, I actually learned a lot! --Christian Liem 00:07, 2 January 2007 (CST)