Talk:History of philosophy of science: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos m (checklisted) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
This must be extended. Main lines can be taken form [[History of Philosophy]], and [[Philosophy of Science]]. --[[User:Matthias Brendel|Matthias Brendel]] 04:56, 11 December 2006 (CST) | This must be extended. Main lines can be taken form [[History of Philosophy]], and [[Philosophy of Science]]. --[[User:Matthias Brendel|Matthias Brendel]] 04:56, 11 December 2006 (CST) | ||
Should this not be part of the [[Philosophy of science]] article? The history of the subject and a description of the subject will overlap enormously I'd have thought. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 17:28, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | Should this not be part of the [[Philosophy of science]] article? The history of the subject and a description of the subject will overlap enormously I'd have thought. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 17:28, 8 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 13:22, 3 November 2007
|
Metadata here |
This must be extended. Main lines can be taken form History of Philosophy, and Philosophy of Science. --Matthias Brendel 04:56, 11 December 2006 (CST)
Should this not be part of the Philosophy of science article? The history of the subject and a description of the subject will overlap enormously I'd have thought. --Peter J. King Talk 17:28, 8 April 2007 (CDT)