Talk:Dividend Discount Model: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris day m (Talk:Dividend discount model ON WHEELSS!!! moved to Talk:Dividend discount model: revert) |
imported>Petréa Mitchell (Big Cleanup checklist) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Dividend Discount Model | |||
| cat1 = Economics | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = n | |||
| status = 1 | |||
| underlinked = n | |||
| cleanup = y | |||
| by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 21:38, 28 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
Discussion invited! | Discussion invited! | ||
Revision as of 14:38, 28 March 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Economics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 21:38, 28 March 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Discussion invited!
I'm not sure whether much more could be said on this subject. The formulas are, afaik, correct. The assumptions are enumerated, and the practical limitatiations arising from those assumptions are described.
In my experience (but I'm into bonds and macro economics, and try to stay away from equities as far as possible) the DDM is not used much in day-to-day equities portfolio management. Theoretically, it is no doubt quite sound, but reality as often as not refuses to behave according to the textbooks.;)
I think this article could be listed as "fit for pulication", in the sense that it is, in its present form, correct as to facts and sufficiently complete.
Best regards, Martin van Dalen 13:38, 20 November 2006 (CST)
DDM
Hi all,
I thinks that this article is the example of an "almost-finished article". Everyone interested in that matter should take a look at it. Annote it, modify,.. etc.. and then, in some times (one week..?), it should be removed from the workgroup.
As soon as it someone found that an article is "almost-finished", we should notice it in the Talk page.
Anh Nguyen 01:36, 21 November 2006 (CST)
- Glad to read you agree with me. BTW, does anybody know what the formal procedure is for approval? Martin van Dalen 13:33, 23 November 2006 (CST)
- Economics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Economics Advanced Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Economics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Economics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Economics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Economics External Articles
- Economics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Economics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup