Talk:Geophysics: Difference between revisions
imported>Dhananjay Ravat No edit summary |
imported>Petréa Mitchell (Article checklist) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Geophysics | |||
| cat1 = Earth Sciences | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = n | |||
| status = 4 | |||
| underlinked = y | |||
| cleanup = y | |||
| by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 21:21, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
The list of important publications in here grossly incomplete and not very useful for readers wanting to find out about the topics. | The list of important publications in here grossly incomplete and not very useful for readers wanting to find out about the topics. | ||
Revision as of 20:21, 8 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Earth Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | External article: from another source, with little change |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 21:21, 8 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
The list of important publications in here grossly incomplete and not very useful for readers wanting to find out about the topics.
I suggest removing it for now and then adding a better list later.
After this I believe this can go live. Dhananjay Ravat 06:46, 8 November 2006 (CST)
As an encyclopedia article, a definition plus a list does not strike me as adequate. Shouldn't there at least be a longer introduction to the subject areas and methods of geophysics? --Larry Sanger 22:52, 7 November 2006 (CST)
Since there can always be links to more specifics (and there are already a few), I thought this would be enough with a few changes. But I will think about what more one could add without getting distracted from the primary message. In my opinion, people have very little time to read these days, and a longer version of a broad discipline like Geophysics cannot be done without bias and without a lot of thought. (If I were writing a paper encyclopedia entry for this topic, it would take me a month to achieve a good article.) So the persons who had written the previous version had done a reasonably good job in my opinion, but I just made a few corrections and some reorganization. Dhananjay Ravat 06:46, 8 November 2006 (CST)
- Earth Sciences Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Earth Sciences Advanced Articles
- Earth Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Earth Sciences Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Earth Sciences Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Earth Sciences Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Earth Sciences Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Earth Sciences External Articles
- Earth Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Earth Sciences Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup