User talk:K kay shearin

Welcome, Kay! --Larry Sanger 02:19, 31 October 2006 (CST)

Law

I suspect it was forgotten, since if you look at the workgroup talk page it is one of the original workgroups. Chris Day (Talk) 10:38, 7 December 2006 (CST)

Category re queen consorts

Hi Kay, far be it from me to discourage boldness, which I generally admire, I don't think we should use categories as a special kind of article, but your latest Category entry Category:English queens consort would imply we're doing that. Actually, we are long overdue discussing the whole matter of categories and what to do with them. Frankly, I think we should probably delete them all and either start over, or do something entirely different. I hope I'll have time to elaborate more tomorrow. --Larry Sanger 22:27, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Very short articles and BSD

I'm not going to mark Hemlock for speedy delete (as well as other somewhat recently created stubs of yours which would otherwise fall under the category of very short articles (<2 sentences and <50 words) and are candidates for deletion. I kinda wish the deleters would wait a couple of days so that folks would have a chance to remove the BSD tag if it is on their watch list, though. James F. Perry 22:18, 19 February 2007 (CST)

Now I'm confused. Anyway, here is why the stubs have been getting tagged BSD (from the BSD guidelines)::

"really, really short articles: it consists of two sentences or less, or 50 words or less, which have been left on the wiki for more than two hours."

But are you telling me that people actually go in and remove the square brackets which create links? Or are you talking about links such as the one on the Hemlock article to an external source?

Oh, and I'm working on the Trial of Joan of Arc page. It is currently in the History Workgroup. I was thinking of moving it to the Law Workgroup where it would go with other famous Trials (Socrates, Scopes, Nuremburg, etc). What do you think? James F. Perry 23:07, 19 February 2007 (CST)