CZ Talk:Creating an article with subpages: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
George Swan (talk | contribs) (→Clarification please...: new section) |
George Swan (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
#* The optional Related article subpage, if it exists, should also begin with <nowiki><noinclude>{{subpages}}</noinclude></nowiki>, correct? | #* The optional Related article subpage, if it exists, should also begin with <nowiki><noinclude>{{subpages}}</noinclude></nowiki>, correct? | ||
# When I first started using subpages here, I thought they were a good idea. Then, when I started an article under a slightly wrong name, and created all the metapages for it, before I realized the name was wrong. I know someone, eventually, created a way to move the article, and all its subpages. But I can't remember how it is done. | # When I first started using subpages here, I thought they were a good idea. Then, when I started an article under a slightly wrong name, and created all the metapages for it, before I realized the name was wrong. I know someone, eventually, created a way to move the article, and all its subpages. But I can't remember how it is done. | ||
# The guided form used to offer a list of approved templates. I always struggled to figure out which categories to use for articles I thought should belong to the non-existent Transport category. Could a transport category be allowed? | |||
# There was another template, <code>Template:Creditline</code>. It also required creating a new template for each image where the same credit should appear on all images. But <nowiki>{{creditline}}</nowiki> had to be explicitly put in the images caption. <p>Is it also old? Should I consider it deprecated? | # There was another template, <code>Template:Creditline</code>. It also required creating a new template for each image where the same credit should appear on all images. But <nowiki>{{creditline}}</nowiki> had to be explicitly put in the images caption. <p>Is it also old? Should I consider it deprecated? | ||
Cheers! [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 16:27, 26 March 2022 (CDT) | Cheers! [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 16:27, 26 March 2022 (CDT) |
Revision as of 15:33, 26 March 2022
Clarification please...
Clarification please...
- The actual metagpage is supposed to be in the
Template:
namespace, correct? - With regard to the actual metagpage, for some articles the "pagename" field and the "abc" field will be the same, correct?
This is not obvious, and I think should be explicitly stated. So, Mao Zedong's name is a chinese name, where his family name, Mao, comes first. So his two fields are the same.
- Obviously articles about people with western style names, where the surname comes last, should have different values for these fields.
- Well, for nautical vessels, should we just go with what make sense, or is there a style guide?
- Wikipedia's disambiguation page lists: HMS Discovery (1600), HMS Discovery (1651), HMS Discovery (1692), HMS Discovery (1719), HMS Discovery (1741), HMS Discovery (1774), HMS Discovery (1789), HMS Discovery (1800), HMS Discovery (1874).
- So, their abc field would say something like: "Discovery, HMS (1741)", or "Discovery, HMS, (1741)", or "Discovery, HMS, 1741". Someone just trying what makes sense could pick any of those three...
- If subpages are to be used some are more or less essential, while others are optional?
- Article's specific talk page is not considered optional. It should exist, even if all it should contain is {{subpages}}, correct?
- The Definition subpage is optional, but if it exists its first line should be <noinclude>{{subpages}}</noinclude>, correct?
- The optional Related article subpage, if it exists, should also begin with <noinclude>{{subpages}}</noinclude>, correct?
- When I first started using subpages here, I thought they were a good idea. Then, when I started an article under a slightly wrong name, and created all the metapages for it, before I realized the name was wrong. I know someone, eventually, created a way to move the article, and all its subpages. But I can't remember how it is done.
- The guided form used to offer a list of approved templates. I always struggled to figure out which categories to use for articles I thought should belong to the non-existent Transport category. Could a transport category be allowed?
- There was another template,
Template:Creditline
. It also required creating a new template for each image where the same credit should appear on all images. But {{creditline}} had to be explicitly put in the images caption.Is it also old? Should I consider it deprecated?
Cheers! George Swan (talk) 16:27, 26 March 2022 (CDT)