Root and Branch Petition: Difference between revisions
imported>Martin Wyatt mNo edit summary |
imported>John Stephenson m (bolding) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
The '''Root and Branch Petition'' was presented to the [[House of Commons]] on 11 December 1640 by a large group of Londoners and others. It asked for the abolition of the government of the English Church by archbishops, bishops, etc, and its jurisdictions, "with all its dependencies, roots and branches". It came right at the beginning of the [[Long Parliament]] and was significant because it set out most of the grievances against the [[Church of England]] under the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]] [[William Laud]], hence, by implication, against the rule of [[Charles I]], and because it helped to set the tone for the Parliament. | The '''Root and Branch Petition''' was presented to the [[House of Commons]] on 11 December 1640 by a large group of Londoners and others. It asked for the abolition of the government of the English Church by archbishops, bishops, etc, and its jurisdictions, "with all its dependencies, roots and branches". It came right at the beginning of the [[Long Parliament]] and was significant because it set out most of the grievances against the [[Church of England]] under the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]] [[William Laud]], hence, by implication, against the rule of [[Charles I]], and because it helped to set the tone for the Parliament. | ||
The petitition set out 35 particular grievances relating to rituals, restrictions on preachers, and other matters, in addition to the extension of canon law and its freedom from the jurisdiction of the ordinary courts. Some of the effects of these were set out with the grievances, but at the end there was also a listing of three "dangerous consequences": the encouragement of the Romish religion, the emigration of many businessmen because of persecution, and the war with the Scots.<ref>Gardiner, S R (ed). ''The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution 1625—1660''. Oxford University Press. 3rd ed 1906</ref> | The petitition set out 35 particular grievances relating to rituals, restrictions on preachers, and other matters, in addition to the extension of canon law and its freedom from the jurisdiction of the ordinary courts. Some of the effects of these were set out with the grievances, but at the end there was also a listing of three "dangerous consequences": the encouragement of the Romish religion, the emigration of many businessmen because of persecution, and the war with the Scots.<ref>Gardiner, S R (ed). ''The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution 1625—1660''. Oxford University Press. 3rd ed 1906</ref> | ||
Revision as of 17:35, 1 March 2021
The Root and Branch Petition was presented to the House of Commons on 11 December 1640 by a large group of Londoners and others. It asked for the abolition of the government of the English Church by archbishops, bishops, etc, and its jurisdictions, "with all its dependencies, roots and branches". It came right at the beginning of the Long Parliament and was significant because it set out most of the grievances against the Church of England under the Archbishop of Canterbury William Laud, hence, by implication, against the rule of Charles I, and because it helped to set the tone for the Parliament.
The petitition set out 35 particular grievances relating to rituals, restrictions on preachers, and other matters, in addition to the extension of canon law and its freedom from the jurisdiction of the ordinary courts. Some of the effects of these were set out with the grievances, but at the end there was also a listing of three "dangerous consequences": the encouragement of the Romish religion, the emigration of many businessmen because of persecution, and the war with the Scots.[1]
In due course, the Parliament implemented the main requests in the petition. At the Restoration the Anglican church hierarchy was restored, but its jurisdiction and that of its courts were restricted, and the courts were left subject to the ordinary law courts.
- ↑ Gardiner, S R (ed). The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution 1625—1660. Oxford University Press. 3rd ed 1906