Subjective-objective dichotomy/External Links: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews
(more details of sources)
imported>John R. Brews
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


*{{cite web|url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114127/science-not-enemy-humanities |author=Steven Pinker |title=Science is not your enemy: An impassioned plea to professors and tenure-less historians |publisher=New Republic |date=August 6, 2013}} Pinker's essay on science and the humanities: "Surely our conceptions of politics, culture, and morality have much to learn from our best understanding of the physical universe and of our makeup as a species."
*{{cite web
|url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114127/science-not-enemy-humanities  
|author=Steven Pinker  
|title=Science is not your enemy: An impassioned plea to professors and tenure-less historians  
|publisher=New Republic  
|date=August 6, 2013}} Pinker's essay on science and the humanities: "Surely our conceptions of politics, culture, and morality have much to learn from our best understanding of the physical universe and of our makeup as a species."


*{{cite web |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114548/leon-wieseltier-responds-steven-pinkers-scientism |title=Crimes against humanity: Now science wants to invade the liberal arts. Don't let it happen. |author=Leon Wieseltier |publihser=New Republic |date=September 3, 2013}} Wieseltier's reply to Pinker. "The question of the place of science in knowledge, and in society, and in life, is not a scientific question...science [does not] confer any license to extend its categories and its methods beyond its own realms, whose contours are of course a matter of debate."  
*{{cite web |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114548/leon-wieseltier-responds-steven-pinkers-scientism |title=Crimes against humanity: Now science wants to invade the liberal arts. Don't let it happen. |author=Leon Wieseltier  
|publisher=New Republic |date=September 3, 2013}} Wieseltier's reply to Pinker. "The question of the place of science in knowledge, and in society, and in life, is not a scientific question...science [does not] confer any license to extend its categories and its methods beyond its own realms, whose contours are of course a matter of debate."  


*{{cite web |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114754/steven-pinker-leon-wieseltier-debate-science-vs-humanities |title=Science vs. the humanities: Round III |author=Steven Pinker, Leon Wieseltier |date=September 26, 2013 |publihser=New Republic}} Pinker-Wieseltier debate Part III. Pinker: "Good ideas can come from any source, and they must be evaluated on their cogency"; Wieseltier: "I am for a two-state solution. In this arena of tension, as in the other one, I believe that a one-state solution would involve the erasure of one of the realms, its distortion by, and subordination to, an authority that has no legitimate claim over it."
*{{cite web |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114754/steven-pinker-leon-wieseltier-debate-science-vs-humanities |title=Science vs. the humanities: Round III |author=Steven Pinker, Leon Wieseltier |date=September 26, 2013  
|publisher=New Republic}} Pinker-Wieseltier debate Part III. Pinker: "Good ideas can come from any source, and they must be evaluated on their cogency"; Wieseltier: "I am for a two-state solution. In this arena of tension, as in the other one, I believe that a one-state solution would involve the erasure of one of the realms, its distortion by, and subordination to, an authority that has no legitimate claim over it."

Revision as of 17:43, 27 December 2013

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
A hand-picked, annotated list of Web resources about Subjective-objective dichotomy.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner and consider archiving the URLs behind the links you provide. See also related web sources.
  • Steven Pinker, Leon Wieseltier (September 26, 2013). Science vs. the humanities: Round III. New Republic. Pinker-Wieseltier debate Part III. Pinker: "Good ideas can come from any source, and they must be evaluated on their cogency"; Wieseltier: "I am for a two-state solution. In this arena of tension, as in the other one, I believe that a one-state solution would involve the erasure of one of the realms, its distortion by, and subordination to, an authority that has no legitimate claim over it."