Talk:Wikipedia/Activity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>James Yolkowski m (moved Talk:What happened to Wikipedia? to Talk:Decline in activity on Wikipedia: Better describe article's content) |
imported>John Stephenson (→This is an article?: '/Addendum' or '/Activity'?) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::That was my thought too. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 15:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | ::That was my thought too. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 15:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::I'll vote for that. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 18:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | :::I'll vote for that. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 18:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::OK, /Addendum [[CZ:Addendum|might be possible]], or an article-specific subpage perhaps called '/Activity'. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 16:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
==The novelty has worn off, and there are little or no new worlds to conquer== | ==The novelty has worn off, and there are little or no new worlds to conquer== |
Revision as of 10:26, 12 July 2013
This is an article?
Wow. Is this an encyclopedia article or an op-ed? —Tom Morris (talk) 21:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- I think it should be a subpage of Wikipedia or incorporated into that article. As it stands, it's clearly not an article in its own right, and that's before we get into any other issues with it. John Stephenson 21:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- That was my thought too. Peter Jackson 15:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- I'll vote for that. Ro Thorpe 18:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- OK, /Addendum might be possible, or an article-specific subpage perhaps called '/Activity'. John Stephenson 16:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- I'll vote for that. Ro Thorpe 18:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- That was my thought too. Peter Jackson 15:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
The novelty has worn off, and there are little or no new worlds to conquer
Is the point at which something is ready to be finished the point at which it is no longer interesting?
"To conceive and idea is noble; to execute the work is servile." Leonardo da Vinci. Robert A. Estremo 03:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I find the edits I do there are almost always niggles of one kind or another these days. Ro Thorpe 18:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)