Talk:Wikipedia/Activity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert A. Estremo (one thought on WP's decline) |
imported>Peter Jackson |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Wow. Is this an encyclopedia article or an op-ed? —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 21:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC) | Wow. Is this an encyclopedia article or an op-ed? —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 21:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
:I think it should be a subpage of [[Wikipedia]] or incorporated into that article. As it stands, it's clearly not an article in its own right, and that's before we get into any other issues with it. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 21:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | :I think it should be a subpage of [[Wikipedia]] or incorporated into that article. As it stands, it's clearly not an article in its own right, and that's before we get into any other issues with it. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 21:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
::That was my thought too. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 15:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
==The novelty has worn off, and there are little or no new worlds to conquer== | ==The novelty has worn off, and there are little or no new worlds to conquer== | ||
Revision as of 09:29, 10 July 2013
This is an article?
Wow. Is this an encyclopedia article or an op-ed? —Tom Morris (talk) 21:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- I think it should be a subpage of Wikipedia or incorporated into that article. As it stands, it's clearly not an article in its own right, and that's before we get into any other issues with it. John Stephenson 21:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- That was my thought too. Peter Jackson 15:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
The novelty has worn off, and there are little or no new worlds to conquer
Is the point at which something is ready to be finished the point at which it is no longer interesting?
"To conceive and idea is noble; to execute the work is servile." Leonardo da Vinci. Robert A. Estremo 03:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)